IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/eacaec/9718.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Welfare Scarring and Work Related Back Pain: Implications for the Management of Disability

Author

Listed:
  • Richard J. Butler
  • Marjorie L. Baldwin
  • William G. Johnson

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined the economic and administrative correlates of the duration of workers= compensation claims, but none have fully controlled for the impact of worker heterogeneity on durations of work absence. Of particular interest are the ways in which worker heterogeneity affects estimates of negative duration dependence, or Awelfare scarring.@ We estimate Weibull models of claim duration for serious low back injuries in which both the location and shape parameters of the duration distribution are functions of claimant characteristics. The results show that duration dependence effects vary systematically with observed worker characteristics and that allowing the shape parameter of the duration distribution to vary among workers significantly changes coefficients of the location parameter as well. The results imply that work outcomes for job-related injuries could be improved if interventions were targeted to different groups of workers according to the likelihood they will experience negative duration dependence effects rather than the current practice of assuming that service- intensive, early intervention strategies are cost-effective for all injured workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard J. Butler & Marjorie L. Baldwin & William G. Johnson, "undated". "Welfare Scarring and Work Related Back Pain: Implications for the Management of Disability," Working Papers 9718, East Carolina University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:eacaec:9718
    Note: For a copy of the paper, e-mail: baldwinm@mail.ecu.edu
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:eacaec:9718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deecuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.