IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa02p452.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pitfalls and solutions in the application of spatial computable general equilibrium models for transport appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Tavasszy, Lóri
  • Thissen, Mark
  • Muskens, Jos
  • Oosterhaven, Jan

Abstract

This paper discusses how to fine-tune spatial computable general equilibrium (CGE) models to allow an accurate assessment of indirect effects of major infrastructure projects, through the example of the new Dutch CGE model RAEM. The use of spatial equilibrium models for assessing the economic impacts of transport projects is one of the key items on the research agenda for project appraisal in the Netherlands. These models are particularly suitable to analyse indirect effects of transport projects through linkages between the transport sector and the wider economy (i.e. the transport using sectors). Potentially, according to the literature, these impacts can turn out to be up to 40% in magnitude of the direct impacts. There is, however, no general indication that indirect effects are always of this magnitude - this has to be proven on a case-by-case basis. This paper discusses how to fine-tune spatial computable general equilibrium (CGE) models to allow an accurate assessment of these indirect effects. Following recommendations from the UK SACTRA and the Dutch OEEI programmes, we have recently developed a new spatial CGE model (RAEM) for the Netherlands tailored towards applications in transport project appraisal. After two applications of the multisector RAEM model to major Dutch transport infrastructure schemes, a number of lessons have emerged with respect to the applicability of such models to transport appraisal. These lessons concern, in broad terms, the specification of the relations between the transport system and the spatial economic system of production, consumption and, trade. More specifically, they have to do with the specification of transport costs in a spatial CGE framework, the problem of locational boundedness of economic activities and the modelling of the labour market; i.e. the effect of passenger transport infrastructure on commuting and migration. Thus, conventional specifications of spatial equilibrium models can lead to problems in project appraisal in terms of inaccuracies in the assessment of impacts. After discussing the general background of spatial equilibrium models we will discuss the pitfalls in CGE applications for transport project appraisal and propose alternative specifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Tavasszy, Lóri & Thissen, Mark & Muskens, Jos & Oosterhaven, Jan, 2002. "Pitfalls and solutions in the application of spatial computable general equilibrium models for transport appraisal," ERSA conference papers ersa02p452, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/452.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerard De Jong & Hugh Gunn & Warren Walker, 2003. "National and International Freight Transport Models: An Overview and Ideas for Future Development," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 103-124, January.
    2. Sebestyén, Tamás, 2017. "Moving beyond the iceberg model: The role of trade relations in endogenizing transportation costs in computable general equilibrium models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 159-174.
    3. repec:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/34355:y:2011:i:1:p:125 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hansen, Wiljar & Johansen, Bjørn Gjerde, 2017. "Regional repercussions of new transport infrastructure investments: An SCGE model analysis of wider economic impacts," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 38-49.
    5. Knaap, Thijs & Oosterhaven, Jan, 2011. "Measuring the welfare effects of infrastructure: A simple spatial equilibrium evaluation of Dutch railway proposals," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 19-28.
    6. Gwilliam, Ken, 2008. "A review of issues in transit economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 4-22, January.
    7. Jie Zhu & Ying Jin & Marcial Echenique, 2012. "Application of a new spatial computable general equilibrium model for assessing strategic transport and land use development options in London and surrounding regions," ERSA conference papers ersa12p931, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.