IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wil/wileco/2025_113.html

A Theory of Preference Discovery

Author

Abstract

"Is the assumption that people automatically know their own preferences innocuous? We present a theory that explores the implications of having to discover one's preferences. We show that if tastes must be learned through experience, preferences for some goods will be learned over time, but preferences for other goods will never be learned. This is because sampling a new item has an opportunity cost. Learning is less likely for people who are impatient, risk averse, low income, or short-lived, and for consumption items that are rare, are expensive, must be bought in large quantities, or are initially judged negatively relative to other items. Choices will eventually stabilize, but they need not stabilize at true preferences. A pessimistic bias about untried goods should increase with time. Agents will make choice reversals during the learning process. Welfare loss from suboptimal choices will decline over time but need not approach zero. Overall, our results imply that undiscovered preferences could confound interpretation of choice data of all kinds and could have significant welfare and policy implications."

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Delaney & Sarah Jacobson & Thorsten Moenig, 2025. "A Theory of Preference Discovery," Department of Economics Working Papers 2025_113, Department of Economics, Williams College.
  • Handle: RePEc:wil:wileco:2025_113
    DOI: 10.36934/wecon:2025_113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36934/wecon:2025_113
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36934/wecon:2025_113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wil:wileco:2025_113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Greg Phelan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edwilus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.