IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

EU Enlargement: Economic Impacts on Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia

Listed author(s):
  • Peter Havlik


    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

This overview paper deals with selected economic aspects of EU enlargement related to Austria and the five Central European countries Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia (CEC-5). Since the fall of the Iron Curtain, Austria has been enjoying over-proportionate gains from liberalized trade and capital flows. EU enlargement will cement and further increase these gains. However, the current weakening of the EU economy could adversely affect the climate for enlargement just at a time when accession negotiations are entering their most difficult phase. The CEC economies will grow by about 3 to 4% on average in both 2001 and 2002, a marked deceleration of growth is forecast only for Poland. Most CECs suffer from high and growing unemployment. In Austria, economic growth is set to decelerate to 1.3% in 2001 and may pick up slightly next year while unemployment will remain low. CEC candidates' benefits from EU accession will be large in the short and medium run, though their costs associated with the takeover of aquis communautaire will also be considerable. Estimates of the implications from the full participation in the European Single Market show that EU enlargement is a win-win situation. The CECs will on average gain around ten times more than the EU. Hungary and Poland may increase their real GDP by an additional 8 to 9% over a ten-year period (including the pre-accession period 2001 to 2004), the Czech Republic gains somewhat less (4 to 6%), just as Slovakia and Slovenia. Austria is probably the biggest enlargement winner among the EU member states; it could additionally gain some 0.7% of GDP. The stronger growth impact of enlargement in the CECs spurs their income convergence and thus reduces the migration potential. The overall impact on the EU labour market should be limited. For Austria, the number of residents from CECs is estimated to increase from around 1.3 % of the Austrian population to 5.5% in 2030. Due to similar demographic trends in both the present EU and the CEC candidates, migration/labour shortages may become a major source of concern in CECs as well. Blocking inward migration while outward migration continues could negatively affect both economic growth and the stability of social security systems. Political considerations play a crucial role in this segment of accession negotiations. Austria is among the leading trading partners of the CECs. Exports to this region amounted to nearly EUR 8.5 billion in 2000, the Austrian trade balance with the CECs has traditionally been in surplus. Trade with CECs has a clearly positive impact on both Austrian output and employment. By the end of 2000, nearly USD 80 billion of FDI entered the CEC-5, of which about USD 6 billion (7% of the total) came from Austria, creating favourable conditions for further economic expansion. Additional trade effects of EU enlargement are bound to be limited. FDI-related trade exchanges will grow and one may expect increases in services trade. Intense economic co-operation shows that the current political disputes between Austria and some CECs apparently do not affect decision-making processes at company level. In sum, economic data confirm the growing importance of regional integration in Central Europe and its benefits for all countries concerned.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Order URL / Description
Download Restriction: Only to order

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Paper provided by The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw in its series wiiw Research Reports with number 280.

in new window

Length: 36 pages including 19 Tables and 1 Figure
Date of creation: Oct 2001
Publication status: Published as wiiw Research Report
Handle: RePEc:wii:rpaper:rr:280
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Rahlgasse 3, A-1060 Vienna

Phone: (+43-1) 533 66 10
Fax: (+43-1) 533 66 10-50
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:rpaper:rr:280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Customer service)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.