IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wii/ratpap/rpg32.html

Neue Wege für die EU-Türkei-Wirtschaftsbeziehungen – Zollunion im Wandel?

Author

Listed:
  • Meryem Gökten

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Richard Grieveson

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Oliver Reiter

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

Abstract

Neue Wege für die EU-Türkei-Wirtschaftsbeziehungen – Zollunion im Wandel? This publication is available in German language only. For a brief English summary see further below. Dieser Bericht analysiert die wirtschaftlichen Entwicklungen der EU-Türkei-Zollunion und deren geopolitische Implikationen. Während das Handelsvolumen seit 1996 gestiegen ist, haben die EU und Österreich als Handelspartner an relativer Bedeutung verloren, insbesondere zugunsten Russlands und Chinas. Auch innerhalb Europas zeigen sich Verschiebungen Der Handel verlagert sich zunehmend zugunsten osteuropäischer Mitgliedstaaten, während die Beziehungen zu traditionellen westeuropäischen Partnern, insbesondere den großen Volkswirtschaften, tendenziell rückläufig sind. Spanien bildet eine Ausnahme, wo sich das Handelsvolumen aufgrund enger politischer und wirtschaftlicher Beziehungen deutlich erhöhte. Zwar hat die Zollunion den Handel insgesamt deutlich gefördert, doch ihr enger Umfang sowie insbesondere bestehende nichttarifäre Handelshemmnisse schränken das Exportpotenzial für die Mehrheit der EU-Mitgliedstaaten weiterhin ein. Neue US-Zölle und der eskalierende transatlantische Handelskonflikt erschweren zusätzlich die bilateralen Handelsbeziehungen zwischen der EU und der Türkei. Gleichzeitig öffnen sie jedoch Spielräume für eine Modernisierung. Aber die Zollunion bleibt politisch umstritten Im Laufe der Jahre haben politische Differenzen, innenpolitische Turbulenzen in der Türkei sowie der daraus resultierende stagnierende EU-Beitrittsprozess das bilaterale Verhältnis zunehmend belastet. Trotz ihrer wachsenden geopolitischen Bedeutung gilt die Türkei weiterhin als instabile Partnerin Die Verhaftung des Istanbuler Bürgermeisters Ekrem İmamoğlu und die Repressionen gegen die größte Oppositionspartei CHP haben das Vertrauen europäischer Partner weiter geschwächt, mit negativen Folgen nicht nur für die politischen Beziehungen, sondern auch für das Vertrauen von Investor innen. In vier Szenarien untersuchen wir die Auswirkungen möglicher Handelsentwicklungen auf Wohlfahrt und Handelsströme, insbesondere für die EU und die Türkei. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass eine tiefgreifende Modernisierung der Zollunion das Handelsvolumen zwischen der Türkei und der EU deutlich erhöhen und spürbare Wohlfahrtsgewinne für die Türkei erzielen, die negativen Effekte eines Handelskonflikts mit den USA für die EU aber nur sehr gering abmildern könnte. New paths for EU-Turkey economic relations – Custom Union in transition? This report analyses economic developments since the introduction of the EU–Turkey Customs Union and examines the geopolitical implications of its modernisation. While EU–Turkey trade has grown since 1996, the EU and Austria have lost market share in Turkey’s overall trade, particularly to Russia and China. Shifts are also visible within Europe trade is increasingly tilting toward Eastern European member states, while ties with traditional Western partners, especially the large economies, are gradually weakening. Spain is an exception, with trade volume increasing significantly due to its close political and economic ties with Turkey. Although the customs union has significantly promoted trade overall, its narrow scope and, in particular, existing non-tariff trade barriers continue to limit the export potential for the majority of EU member states. New US tariffs and the escalating transatlantic trade dispute are further complicating EU-Turkey trade relations. At the same time, the EU continues to conclude new FTAs, which intensifies the asymmetry of the customs union for Turkey and reinforces the need for modernisation. Yet the customs union remains politically contentious within the EU long-standing political disagreements, domestic turbulence in Turkey, and the stalled accession process have increasingly strained bilateral relations. Despite its growing geopolitical importance and the need to modernise the customs union, Turkey continues to be seen as an unstable partner. The arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu and the crackdown on the main opposition party, the CHP, have further eroded the confidence of European partners, harming political relations as well as investor sentiment. In four scenarios, we assess how different modernisation options for the customs union would affect welfare and trade flows for the EU and Turkey. The results show that a comprehensive upgrade of the customs union could substantially increase EU-Turkey trade and deliver clear welfare gains for Turkey, but would only marginally cushion the EU from the negative effects of a trade conflict with the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Meryem Gökten & Richard Grieveson & Oliver Reiter, 2025. "Neue Wege für die EU-Türkei-Wirtschaftsbeziehungen – Zollunion im Wandel?," wiiw Research Reports in German language 32, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
  • Handle: RePEc:wii:ratpap:rpg:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wiiw.ac.at/neue-wege-fuer-die-eu-tuerkei-wirtschaftsbeziehungen--zollunion-im-wandel-dlp-7470.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Larch & Yoto V. Yotov, 2016. "General Equilibrium Trade Policy Analysis with Structural Gravity," CESifo Working Paper Series 6020, CESifo.
    2. Javier Flórez Mendoza & Oliver Reiter & Robert Stehrer, 2024. "EU carbon border tax: General equilibrium effects on income and emissions," wiiw Working Papers 254, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    3. Julia Grübler & Oliver Reiter, 2021. "Non-Tariff Trade Policy in the Context of Deep Trade Integration: An Ex-Post Gravity Model Application to the EU-South Korea Agreement," East Asian Economic Review, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, vol. 25(1), pages 33-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meryem Gökten & Richard Grieveson & Oliver Reiter, 2025. "Neue Wege für die EU-Türkei-Wirtschaftsbeziehungen – Zollunion im Wandel?," FIW Research Reports series 05, FIW.
    2. Zouheir El-Sahli, 2023. "The Partial and General Equilibrium Effects of the Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 185-199, March.
    3. Agnosteva, Delina E. & Anderson, James E. & Yotov, Yoto V., 2019. "Intra-national trade costs: Assaying regional frictions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 32-50.
    4. Anirudh Shingal & Prachi Agarwal, 2020. "How did trade in GVC-based products respond to previous health shocks? Lessons for COVID-19," RSCAS Working Papers 2020/68, European University Institute.
    5. Ronald B. Davies & Lena S. Specht, 2025. "Brexit and foreign students in gravity," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 290-333, February.
    6. Beniamino Quintieri & Giovanni Stamato, 2023. "Are preferential agreements beneficial to EU trade? New evidence from the EU–South Korea treaty," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3511-3541, December.
    7. Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr & Richard Sellner, 2021. "Revisiting time as a trade barrier: Evidence from a panel structural gravity model," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1382-1417, November.
    8. Timo Walter, 2022. "Trade and welfare effects of a potential free trade agreement between Japan and the United States," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(4), pages 1199-1230, November.
    9. Gabriel Felbermayr & Hendrik Mahlkow & Alexander Sandkamp, 2023. "Cutting through the value chain: the long-run effects of decoupling the East from the West," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 75-108, February.
    10. Annette Broocks & Zuzanna Studnicka, 2025. "Gravity and trade in video on demand services," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 161(2), pages 571-609, May.
    11. Jena, Devasmita & Muzaffar, Uzair & Choudhury, Rahul Nath, 2025. "Weaning Away from China – Trade and Welfare Implications," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    12. Borchert, Ingo & Yotov, Yoto V., 2017. "Distance, globalization, and international trade," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 32-38.
    13. Baier, Scott L. & Yotov, Yoto V. & Zylkin, Thomas, 2019. "On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 206-226.
    14. Luca Alfieri, 2021. "Heterogeneity of financial institutions in the process of economic and monetary integration in East Asia," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 1053-1076, April.
    15. Ellalee, Haider & Alali, Walid Y., 2018. "Brexit Impact on the UK Trade Agreements," MPRA Paper 117509, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Jan 2018.
    16. Benedikt Heid & Mario Larch & Yoto V. Yotov, 2021. "Estimating the effects of non‐discriminatory trade policies within structural gravity models," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 376-409, February.
    17. Noemi Walczak & Kenan Huremovi'c & Armando Rungi, 2025. "The Network Effects of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism with a Quantitative Trade Model," Papers 2506.23341, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    18. Jung, Benjamin, 2022. "The Trade Effects of the EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement: Heterogeneity across Time, Country Pairs, and Directions of Trade within Country Pairs," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264125, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "The evolution of structural gravity: The workhorse model of trade," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(4), pages 578-603, October.
    20. Dimitar Zlatinov & Nedko Kosev & Stoyan Shalamanov, 2022. "Regional Electricity Trade in South East Europe – Findings from a Panel Structural Gravity Model," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 8, pages 3-18.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:ratpap:rpg:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wiiwwat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.