IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wii/fdirep/fdi2011-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diverging Patterns of FDI Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Gabor Hunya

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Monika Schwarzhappel

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

Abstract

Content The first part of the publication contains an analysis of the latest FDI trends. The analysis highlights the diverging patterns of FDI recovery in 2010. The second part of the publication contains two sets of tables Tables I total flow and stock data, FDI flow by form and FDI income, FDI per capita and other FDI reference parameter (2002-2010) Tables II detailed FDI data by economic activity and by country (last four years) The main sources of data are the central banks of the individual Central, East and Southeast European countries. General Description (PDF) Abstract FDI continues to be of great significance for the development of CEECs, in particular of the new EU members. The domestic engines of economic growth are still weak, and fiscal consolidation drags on the economies. Recovery started mainly based on external demand which has upgraded the importance of foreign investors that generate the major part of exports. The first part of the publication, following detailed methodological explanations of FDI related terminology, provides an analysis of the latest FDI trends. Modest and uneven recovery characterized the development of FDI in CEECs in 2010 which recorded an increase of 9% (in current euro terms). The strongest growth occurred in Russia, the Czech Republic, Latvia and Lithuania. Bulgaria, Romania and Southeast Europe booked another year of severe decline. FDI was attracted mainly by three factors domestic economic growth based on exports, improving financial stability reducing investment risk, and the recovery of the financial position of investors. All three factors coincided positively in the Czech Republic, while e.g. in Hungary investment risks were accumulated in the financial sector but new equity investments went into the export-oriented automotive industry. The number of new greenfield projects recovered strongly throughout the region but they promise less investment value than in the previous year. As for 2011, wiiw experts are more optimistic than global surveys and expect a 27% increase of FDI inflows to the CEECs. Most of the FDI growth will be allocated to Russia, much of it, as in the past, invested by Russian off-shore companies. The proximity to highly developed European countries with growing economies is expected to attract substantial FDI in the NMS (+10%) and the SEE (+29%). The second part of this publication contains two sets of tables Tables in part I cover FDI flow and stock data, FDI flows by form and related income; Tables in part II provide detailed FDI data by economic activity and by country. The main sources of data are the central banks of the individual Central, East and Southeast European countries. Table of contents (PDF) Related Publication The CD-ROM version contains Excel, CSV, TSV, HTML data (time series from 1990 onwards) PDF version of the hardcopy Available time series (XLS) wiiw Database on Foreign Direct Investment 2011 CD-ROM

Suggested Citation

  • Gabor Hunya & Monika Schwarzhappel, 2011. "Diverging Patterns of FDI Recovery," wiiw FDI Reports 2011-05, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
  • Handle: RePEc:wii:fdirep:fdi:2011-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wiiw.ac.at/diverging-patterns-of-fdi-recovery-dlp-718.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annamaria Artner, 2015. "Capital, labour, democracy and the end of capitalism," IWE Working Papers 216, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies- Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    2. Saul Estrin & Milica Uvalic, 2013. "Foreign direct investment into transition economies: Are the Balkans different?," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 4, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    3. Saul Estrin & Milica Uvalic, 2013. "Foreign direct investment into transition economies: Are the Balkans different?," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 64, European Institute, LSE.
    4. Estrin, Saul & Uvalic, Milica, 2013. "Foreign direct investment into transition economies: are the Balkans different?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 53180, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Denisia Vintila, 2012. "Dynamic Trends Of Foreign Direct Investements And Macroeconomic Changes In Central And Eastern Countries During 2000-2010," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 228-235, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    foreign direct investment; balance of payments; income repatriation; statistics; new EU member states; Southeast Europe; CIS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C82 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data; Data Access
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
    • P23 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Factor and Product Markets; Industry Studies; Population

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:fdirep:fdi:2011-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wiiwwat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.