IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/8912.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Making Secure Land Tenure Count for Global Development Goals and National Policy : Evidence from Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Ali,Daniel Ayalew
  • Deininger,Klaus W.
  • Hilhorst,Dorothea Huberta Maria
  • Kakungu,Frank
  • Yi,Yuanyuan

Abstract

Adding a module designed to measure land tenure-related Sustainable Development Goals indicators to the 2018 round of Zambia's labor force survey shows low transferability and high levels of tenure insecurity. Having a title is associated with greater transferability and reduced insecurity. Although demand for titles, including willingness to pay, is high, current policies limit the scope for tenure regularization and reinforce rather than reduce gender discrimination. Efforts in this direction need to be preceded by (i) procedural reform to reduce costs, streamline procedures, and make them gender-sensitive; (ii) institutional change to increase the efficiency of service delivery and ensure record maintenance; and (iii) legal change to recognize customary tenure and improve land management and transferability. Adding the Sustainable Development Goals land tenure module to ongoing surveys has the potential to provide the evidence base needed to design results-based approaches for the land sector and reliably track progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali,Daniel Ayalew & Deininger,Klaus W. & Hilhorst,Dorothea Huberta Maria & Kakungu,Frank & Yi,Yuanyuan, 2019. "Making Secure Land Tenure Count for Global Development Goals and National Policy : Evidence from Zambia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8912, The World Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:8912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/255701561466664958/pdf/Making-Secure-Land-Tenure-Count-for-Global-Development-Goals-and-National-Policy-Evidence-from-Zambia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Home, 2021. "History and Prospects for African Land Governance: Institutions, Technology and ‘Land Rights for All’," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Feyertag, Joseph & Childress, Malcolm & Langdown, Ian & Locke, Anna & Nizalov, Denys, 2021. "How does gender affect the perceived security of land and property rights? Evidence from 33 countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Huntington, Heather & Stevens, Caleb, 2023. "Taking stock of global land indicators: A comparative analysis of approaches for a globally consistent land tenure security measure," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:8912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.