IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Output-based disclosure control for regressions

Listed author(s):
  • Felix Richie


    (University of the West of England, Bristol)

Many recent developments in social science research, especially economics, have arisen from the increased availability of confidential government microdata, often in controlled environments. Output-based statistical disclosure control is increasingly important for making effective use of this resource. A central topic is whether the most common analytical tool, multiple regression, is ‘safe’ for release. This is a relatively unexplored field: only a handful of papers have been produced over the last decade and the main reference for practitioners is an unreviewed internal document. This paper analyses the disclosure risks of linear regressions, and demonstrates that, even in the best-case scenario for an intruder, regression results are fundamentally non-disclosive and so come within the class of ‘safe statistics’. It shows that conflicting results in papers reflect institutional perceptions, not statistical matters. It notes that simple rules can both guarantee confidentiality and provide measures of the best approximation to confidential data. It discusses a number of statistical concerns that are shown to be misguided. Finally, it summarises these results to produce formal guidelines for data owners managing controlled environments.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol in its series Working Papers with number 20121209.

in new window

Date of creation: 09 Jan 2012
Handle: RePEc:uwe:wpaper:20121209
Contact details of provider: Postal:
0117 328 3610

Phone: 0117 328 3610
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwe:wpaper:20121209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Felix Ritchie)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.