IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uwa/wpaper/25-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Government Attention, Characteristics of Officials-in-Charge and Performance of Public Pension Funds in China: A Configuration Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiguang Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine and Key Laboratory of Data Science & Innovative Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Philosophy and Social Sciences of Anhui Province, Hefei, Anhui China)

  • Yanrui Wu

    (University of Western Australia Business School, Perth, Australia)

  • Fan Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui China)

  • Yuqing Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui China)

Abstract

This article examines the nexus between government attention to pension affairs, characteristics of officials-in-charge and performance or efficiency of China’s public pension funds (PPFs). It uses the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis and data of government attention to pension affairs and characteristics of PPF officials from 20 provinces during the period of 2015-2019. The research results show that four configurations namely promotion-driven, resource-endowment-driven, government-led and seniority & localization-empowerment pathway are associated with high efficiency of PPFs. There are also four configurations namely poor professionalism, working efficiency stagnation, lack of local emotional attachment, and policy failure which lead to low efficiency. In addition, the high or low level of efficiency is the result of multiple factors working together rather than a single dominant factor. The professionalism, relevant working experience and local emotional attachment of the officials in charge of PPFs could compensate for the institutional gap due to low government attention to pension affairs. Furthermore, there exists a potential substitution relationship among factors that affect the performance of PPFs. Finally, the efficiency of PPFs is influenced by multiple complex factors that vary significantly across both temporal and spatial dimensions. Policy design should take into account of the diversity of regional economic development levels, official characteristics, and local institutional environments so that flexible and targeted management approaches are adopted to promote the efficient operation of PPFs. Policy makers should pay attention to temporal factors and regional disparities and formulate flexible and adaptive governance strategies tailored to the specific conditions and characteristics of individual provinces.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiguang Li & Yanrui Wu & Fan Zhang & Yuqing Zhang, 2025. "Government Attention, Characteristics of Officials-in-Charge and Performance of Public Pension Funds in China: A Configuration Analysis," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 25-10, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:25-10
    Note: MD5 = a2715c9c70114875779bbc2f4c5bdd37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecompapers.biz.uwa.edu.au/paper/PDF%20of%20Discussion%20Papers/2025/DP%2025.10_Li%20Wu%20Zhang%20Zhang%20and%20Si.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:25-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sam Tang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.