Were Jevons, Menger and Walras really cardinalists? On the notion of measurement in utility theory, psychology, mathematics and other disciplines, ca. 1870–1910
The paper investigates how Jevons, Menger and Walras conceived measurement in general,and the measurement of utility in particular. It argues that these three marginalists understood measurement in the so-called classical way, which is different from the representational understanding of measurement underlying current cardinal utility theory. In accord with the classical view of measurement, Jevons, Menger and Walras associated utility measurement with the possibility of identifying a unit of utility rather than with the ranking of utility differences. Thus, and contrary to the canonical narrative of the history of utility theory, the three marginalists were not cardinalists in the current sense of the term. In order to better understand the actual approach of Jevons, Menger and Walras to utility measurement, the paper situates their thought in the context of ideas of measurement in philosophy, physics, psychology, mathematics and areas of economics not related to utility theory. Focusing on the years 1870-1914, the period in which the three were active, the paper arrives at two conclusions: on the one hand, the classical understanding of measurement dominated not only economics but also other disciplines; but on the other hand, the direct relationships between the reflections on utility measurement by Jevons, Menger and Walras and contemporary noneconomic debates on the topic were negligible
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uto:cesmep:201003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Piero Cavaleri)or (Marina Grazioli)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.