IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/622.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Permutation-based Combination of Sign Tests for Assessing Habitat Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Fattorini

    ()

  • Caterina Pisani

    ()

  • Francesco Riga

    ()

  • Marco Zaccaroni

    ()

Abstract

The analysis of habitat use in radio-tagged animals is approached by comparing the portions of use vs the portions of availability observed for each habitat type. Since data are linearly dependent with singular variance-covariance matrices, standard multivariate statistical test cannot be applied. To overcome the problem, compositional data analysis is customary performed via log-ratio transform of sample observations. The procedure is criticized in this paper, emphasizing the many drawbacks which may arise from the use of compositional analysis. An alternative nonparametric solution is proposed in the framework of multiple testing. The habitat use is assessed separately for each habitat type by means of the sign test performed on the original observations. The resulting p-values are combined in an overall test statistic whose significance is determined permuting sample observations. The theoretical findings of the paper are checked by simulation studies. Applications to some case studies are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Fattorini & Caterina Pisani & Francesco Riga & Marco Zaccaroni, 2011. "A Permutation-based Combination of Sign Tests for Assessing Habitat Selection," Department of Economics University of Siena 622, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  • Handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.deps.unisi.it/quaderni/622.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    compositional data analysis; Johnson’s second order selection; Johnson’s third order selection; Monte Carlo studies; multiple testing; random habitat use.;

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fabrizio Becatti). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/desieit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.