IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/1925.html

Tariffs and technological hegemony

Author

Listed:

Abstract

We provide a theory connecting trade policies to innovation and technological hegemony, based on the notion that high-tech clusters generate technological rents for the countries hosting them. We show that tariffs on high-tech imports may be used to steal technological rents from the rest of the world, by redirecting innovation activities from foreign to domestic firms. This strategy may lead to welfare gains, which however come at the expense of even larger welfare losses in the rest of the world. Tariffs may backfire even for the country imposing them if they are not well designed, or if the rest of the world retaliates.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Fornaro & Martin Wolf, 2025. "Tariffs and technological hegemony," Economics Working Papers 1925, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jan 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/1925.pdf
    File Function: Whole Paper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javier Bianchi & Louphou Coulibaly, 2025. "The Optimal Monetary Policy Response to Tariffs," NBER Working Papers 33560, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & Matthieu Lequien & Marc J. Melitz, 2024. "The Heterogeneous Impact of Market Size on Innovation: Evidence from French Firm-Level Exports," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(3), pages 608-626, May.
    3. Dominick Bartelme & Arnaud Costinot & Dave Donaldson & Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, 2025. "The Textbook Case for Industrial Policy: Theory Meets Data," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(5), pages 1527-1573.
    4. Ferrari, Alessandro & Ossa, Ralph, 2023. "A quantitative analysis of subsidy competition in the U.S," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costinot, Arnaud & Adao, Rodrigo & Carrillo, Paul & Donaldson, Dave & Pomeranz, Dina, 2020. "International Trade and Earnings Inequality: A New Factor Content Approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 15598, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Lu, Bing & Ma, Hong & Hu, Jiashu & Xu, Yuan, 2025. "The employment effects of VAT rebate efficiency: Evidence from SMEs in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
    3. S, Minkyu., 2021. "The impact of trade on R&D: Evidence from UK firms," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2151, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    4. Wang, Han & Tian, Qiong & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2024. "The effects of commuting subsidies in a competitive two-city system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 129-141.
    5. Colantone, Italo & Ottaviano, Gianmarco Ireo Paolo & Stanig, Piero, 2024. "The social footprint of globalization: towards the introduction of strategic industries in quantitative trade models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126837, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Sara Calligaris & Chiara Criscuolo & Luca Marcolin, 2018. "Mark-ups in the digital era," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/10, OECD Publishing.
    7. Malgouyres, Clément & Mayer, Thierry & Mazet-Sonilhac, Clément, 2021. "Technology-induced trade shocks? Evidence from broadband expansion in France," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Ming Xu & Tenglong Zhong & Qian Xie & Hongkui Liu, 2022. "Foreign Demand, Competition Strategy, and Export Markups: Evidence from Chinese Multi‐Product Exporters," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(3), pages 187-209, May.
    9. Holger Breinlich & Elsa Leromain & Dennis Novy & Thomas Sampson, 2021. "Import liberalization as export destruction? Evidence from the United States," CEP Discussion Papers dp1779, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. Han, Yihan & Pang, Silu & Jiang, Fuxin & Wang, Tao, 2025. "Does “Made in China (2025)” improve innovation quality in robotics? Evidence from PageRank-based patent network," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Barrows, Geoffrey & Ollivier, Hélène, 2021. "Foreign demand, developing country exports, and CO2 emissions: Firm-level evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Kun Li & Siyu Wan, 2025. "The Road to Green Development: Vertical Spillovers in the Exports of Environmental Goods by Enterprises," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(4), pages 3546-3573, December.
    13. Martin Beraja & David Y Yang & Noam Yuchtman, 2023. "Data-intensive Innovation and the State: Evidence from AI Firms in China," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(4), pages 1701-1723.
    14. Maczulskij, Terhi & Jurvanen, Outi, 2025. "Export Demand Shocks and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Finnish Exporters," ETLA Working Papers 132, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    15. Wentao, Guo & Hongyu, Nian & Zhiqiang, Zhang, 2025. "How do firms adapt trade liberalization through diverse innovation strategies?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 304-320.
    16. Yueqi Sun & Junlong Ti & Fang Yang & Hsing Hung Chen, 2025. "Blessing or Curse? The Impact of the Penetration of Industrial Robots on Green Sustainable Transformation in Chinese High-Energy-Consuming Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, February.
    17. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/4b7tooefh48jlq7oktt0tbn8om is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Gong, Robin Kaiji & Li, Yao Amber & Manova, Kalina & Sun, Stephen Teng, 2025. "Tickets to the global market: First US patent award and Chinese firm exports," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Pan Yu & Gaoju Yang & Hangyu Chen, 2025. "Does cooperative research affect firms’ technology spillovers? Evidence from China," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1225-1248, December.
    20. Laura Alfaro & Alejandro Cuñat & Harald Fadinger & Yanping Liu, 2017. "The Real Exchange Rate, Innovation and Asymmetries and Hysteresis," Harvard Business School Working Papers 18-044, Harvard Business School, revised May 2018.
    21. Lota D. Tamini & Aristide B. Valéa, 2021. "Investment in research and development and export performances of Canadian small and medium‐sized agri‐food firms," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(3), pages 311-336, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F42 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - International Policy Coordination and Transmission
    • F43 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Economic Growth of Open Economies
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upf.edu/en/web/econ/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.