Poverty-Reducing Institutional Change and PRSP Processes: The Ghana Case
Author
Abstract
This paper assesses the preparation of Ghana's Poverty Reduction Strategy paper (GPRS), paying particular attention to its likely influence on the institutionalisation of anti-poverty measures in the country's political economy. After examining contextual factors, it analyses the strengths and weaknesses of the GPRS processes, including the responses of donors and the extent to which the GPRS will result from wider consultation and participation. It also examines its monitoring and informational aspects.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Kolavalli, Shashidhara & Flaherty, Kathleen & Al-Hassan, Ramatu M. & Baah, Kwaku Owusu, 2010. "Do CAADP processes make a difference to country commitments to develop agriculture? The case of Ghana," IFPRI discussion papers 1006, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
- Rachel Marcus & John Wilkinson & Jenni Marshali, 2002. "Poverty reduction strategy papers (PRSPs)-fulfilling their potential for children in poverty?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(8), pages 1117-1128.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unu/wpaper/dp2001-70.html