IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Growth and Inequality in Mediterranean Region

Listed author(s):
  • Jalal El Ouardighi
  • Rabija Somun-Kapetanovic
Registered author(s):

    The concept of ‘pro-poor growth’ focuses on the interrelation between economic growth, inequality and poverty. The literature has often considered the concept of pro-poor growth within a country by using household data in one or in a large cross-section of countries. In this paper, we adopt the concept of pro-poor to study the income growth dynamics of a set of countries. Hence, the approach enables us to highlight the links with the income convergence studies. The empirical investigations consider the experience of eighteen Mediterranean countries during the period 1989- 2007. The results stress that the per capita income growth is neither pro-poor nor anti-poor, i.e., there is a persistence of inequality. The results show also the sharp contrasts between Mediterranean sub-regions. Thus, the inequality worsened in North Africa, and to a lesser extent, in the North East, whereas the North West sub-region experienced a pro-poor growth process with a significant reduction of income inequality. Finally, the East sub-region exhibits a neutral process of growth with no significant change in income inequality.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg in its series Working Papers of BETA with number 2009-27.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2009
    Handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2009-27
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    PEGE. 61, Aven. de la Forêt-Noire 67000 Strasbourg

    Phone: +33 3 68 85 20 69
    Fax: +33 3 68 85 20 70
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2009-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.