Electoral competition and the unfunding of public pension programs
Most public pension systems failed to build pension funds, even when it was clear that the benefits the systems were paying could not be sustained in the long run. I argue in this paper that politicians ruling public pension programs have strong incentives to exhaust the pension funds, offering generous pensions to old voters to raise the probability of winning the elections. Young voters do not support those electoral proposals to spend the pension fund, since a reduction of the fund will pull pensions down when they retire. The pension fund does not survive if old voters prevail, something that is likely to happen in the model in this paper despite of old voters being less than young voters. Electoral competition favors the elderly because they tend to be more willing to change their vote for a good pension than are young voters to change their vote for a larger pension fund.
|Date of creation:||Mar 2001|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (598) 2410-6449
Fax: (598) 2410-6450
Web page: http://www.fcs.edu.uy/subcategoria.php?SubCatId=48&CatId=53
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ude:wpaper:0101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Irene Musio)or (Héctor Pastori)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.