IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucn/wpaper/201518.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Teams’ Reponses to Changed Incentives: Evidence from Rugby’s Six Nations Championship

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent (Vincent Peter) Hogan
  • Patrick Massey

Abstract

The paper analyses teams’ responses to rule changes designed to encourage more entertaining play in Rugby Union’s Six Nations Championship. We use a data set of all scores in the competition since 1883 to analyse the impact of rule changes on teams’ strategic decisions. We find that increasing the points for a try leads to more tries per match. We also find evidence that teams may be prepared to concede penalties, which are worth fewer points in order to prevent more costly tries. The switch to a winner takes all format in 1994 also led to more tries being scored. Unlike most other major rugby competitions, the Six Nations does not award bonus league points for scoring a certain number of tries and we consider whether this would increase try scoring. Our results may have practical applications given ongoing concerns about a decline in try scoring in the Six Nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent (Vincent Peter) Hogan & Patrick Massey, 2015. "Teams’ Reponses to Changed Incentives: Evidence from Rugby’s Six Nations Championship," Working Papers 201518, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucn:wpaper:201518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7152
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sports economics;

    JEL classification:

    • Z2 - Other Special Topics - - Sports Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucn:wpaper:201518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nicolas Clifton). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/educdie.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.