IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucd/wpaper/10197-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can education compensate for low ability? Evidence from British data (version 3.0)

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Denny
  • Vincent O'Sullivan

Abstract

This paper uses cross section data to investigate whether education and ability are substitutes or complements in the determination of earnings. Using a measure of cognitive ability based on tests taken at ages 7 and 11 we find, unlike most of the existing literature, clear evidence that the return to schooling is lower for those with higher ability indicating that education can act as a substitute for observed ability. We also estimate quantile regression functions to examine how the return to schooling varies across the conditional distribution of earnings. The results show that the return is lower for higher quantiles, suggesting that education is also a substitute for unobserved ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Denny & Vincent O'Sullivan, 2004. "Can education compensate for low ability? Evidence from British data (version 3.0)," Working Papers 10197/170, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:10197/170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/170
    File Function: First version, 2004
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Earnings; Education; Ability; Education; Ability; Wages--Effect of education on;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:10197/170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nicolas Clifton (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/educdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.