Labour Market Matters - May 2013
As governments around the world struggle to reign in ballooning public deficits, one area that has been targeted for cost savings has been to increase the age of eligibility for retirement benefits. In Canada, the March 2012 federal budget announced plans to make a transition in the age of eligibility for Old Age Security from age 65 to 67, starting in 2023. Similar retirement age reforms in Europe have erupted in large-scale protests and civil disorder. Concern exists that those exiting the labour market before statutory retirement ages may suffer hardship before they can access public pensions. A CLSRN study entitled â€œEmployer-provided pensions, incomes, and hardship in early transitions to retirementâ€ (CLSRN Working Paper no. 117) by Kevin Milligan (University of British Columbia) addresses the wellbeing of those making early exits from the workforce by studying the extent, characteristics, and impact of such exits in Canada. Milligan finds that around 77 percent of females and 73 percent of males who are not working are able to avoid low-income status, and that the most important factor for this avoidance is the presence of income from other family members. There had been a dramatic decline in senior poverty rates since the early 1970s in Canada. The introduction and expansion of retirement income programs â€“ including Old Age Security (OAS), the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) and the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans â€“ is often credited with this improvement in the lives of Canadian seniors. A CLSRN study entitled â€œSenior Poverty in Canada: A Decomposition Analysisâ€ (CLSRN Working Paper no. 118) by Tammy Schirle (Wilfrid Laurier University), takes a closer looks at poverty trends in Canada and examines the extent to which other factors might have contributed to changes in senior poverty. While the evolution of characteristics such as education can account for some of the historical reduction in senior poverty, it does not explain very much. Rather, her results support the assertion that retirement income policy is central to understanding senior poverty in Canada.
|Date of creation:||29 May 2013|
|Date of revision:||29 May 2013|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.clsrn.econ.ubc.ca/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2013-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vivian Tran)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.