IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tth/wpaper/50.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Three Paradigms of Governance and Administration: Chinese, Western and Islamic

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Drechsler

Abstract

The title of this essay is programmatic: I will attempt to suggest and tentatively conceptualize and that there are (at least) three paradigms of governance and especially public administration (PA). Briefly put, this means that there is not one global best (practice of) PA, but that what we call global PA is actually Western PA . and, today, that means to a large extent Anglo-American PA. If we follow Bouckaertÿs (2011) suggestion that PA has two dimensions, equity (goals) and performance (mechanics), inextricably linked though they may often be, we call this global PA ´good PA¡ if it is both ´working¡ and ´ethical¡. With paradigms, I first of all mean the potentiality and theory . we may also say possible epistemes . rather than reality and practice as we observe it today of forms of what we can call Non-Western PA (NWPA). It is the availability of the potential that, in light of the reality as it exists, may make this topic relevant.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Drechsler, 2013. "Three Paradigms of Governance and Administration: Chinese, Western and Islamic," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 50, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
  • Handle: RePEc:tth:wpaper:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hum.ttu.ee/wp/paper50.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolfgang Drechsler, 2015. "Debate: Islamic PA-does it exist, what is it, and why and how should we study it?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 63-64, January.
    2. Stelios Lekakis & Shobhit Shakya & Vasilis Kostakis, 2018. "Bringing the Community Back: A Case Study of the Post-Earthquake Heritage Restoration in Kathmandu Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Caichen Ma & Yunxiao Xu & James L. Chan, 2015. "Debate: Wang Anshi and Confucian public management--a rejoinder," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 253-254, July.
    4. Hong Liu & Celia Lee & Chris Alden, 2022. "The Dynamics of Governance and Sustainable Development Goals in the Global South," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S1), pages 5-10, April.
    5. repec:thr:techub:10034:y:2022:i:1:p:54-83 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Wolfgang Drechsler, 2014. "Debate: Towards understanding Wang Anshi and Confucian public management," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 246-248, July.
    7. Joshua Newman & Emi Patmisari & Ida Widianingsih, 2022. "Policy analytical capacity and "Eastern" styles of policy analysis: evidence from West Java Province, Indonesia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 469-485, September.
    8. Suhartono Suhartono & Roy Valiant Salomo & Umanto Eko Prasetyo, 2022. "The Alignment Challenges of Development Planning and Budgeting: Insights from Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 54-83, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F54 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Colonialism; Imperialism; Postcolonialism
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tth:wpaper:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shobhit Shakya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ahittee.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.