IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutions, Reforms, and Country Risk: Lessons from Japanese Government Debt in the Meiji Period


  • Nathan Sussman
  • Yishay Yafeh

    (Hebrew University/University of Tokyo)


We evaluate the effect of the establishment of modern state institutions (e.g. a central bank or a constitution) on the risk premium associated with government debt traded abroad. Drawing on evidence from one of the most dramatic reform periods in modern history, and using data on sovereign debt traded in London between 1870 and 1914, we investigate the impact of major reforms on the yields of Japanese government debt following the Meiji Restoration. We show that, although the risk premium on Japanese debt declined during the period, the establishment of modern, western institutions did not elicit an immediate market response. The one institutional reform that significantly reduced the perceived risk associated with Japanese bonds was the adoption of the Gold Standard in 1897. In addition, political events such as the Anglo-Japanese treaty (1902) and the military victory over Russia (1905) improved Japan's debt capacity, and led to a substantial increase in the volume of Japanese debt. We conclude that, at least in the short run, well understood monetary rules as well as military achievements matter more for the perception of a country by foreign investors than modern state institutions, although we do not rule out the possibility that in the long run institutions do affect a country's credit rating.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Sussman & Yishay Yafeh, 1998. "Institutions, Reforms, and Country Risk: Lessons from Japanese Government Debt in the Meiji Period," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-20, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
  • Handle: RePEc:tky:fseres:98cf20

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Amable, Bruno, 1999. "Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 99-309, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Martinez Fritscher, André C. & Musacchio, Aldo, 2010. "Endowments, fiscal federalism and the cost of capital for states: evidence from Brazil, 1891–1930," Financial History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(01), pages 13-50, April.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tky:fseres:98cf20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CIRJE administrative office). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.