Who’s Afraid of Policy Experiments?
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Robert Dur & Arjan Non & Paul Prottung & Benedetta Ricci, 2024. "Who’s Afraid of Policy Experiments?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11194, CESifo.
- Dur, Robert & Non, Arjan & Prottung, Paul & Ricci, Benedetta, 2023. "Who's Afraid of Policy Experiments?," OSF Preprints yshkt, Center for Open Science.
References listed on IDEAS
- Jonas Hjort & Diana Moreira & Gautam Rao & Juan Francisco Santini, 2021.
"How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(5), pages 1442-1480, May.
- Jonas Hjort & Diana Moreira & Gautam Rao & Juan Francisco Santini, 2019. "How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities," NBER Working Papers 25941, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hjort, Jonas & Rao, Gautam & Moreira, Diana & Santini, Juan Francisco, 2020. "How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities," CEPR Discussion Papers 14280, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Shaoda Wang & David Y. Yang, 2021. "Policy Experimentation in China: the Political Economy of Policy Learning," NBER Working Papers 29402, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Ernesto Dal Bó & Pedro Dal Bó & Erik Eyster, 2018.
"The Demand for Bad Policy when Voters Underappreciate Equilibrium Effects,"
The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(2), pages 964-998.
- Ernesto Dal Bó & Pedro Dal Bó & Erik Eyster, 2016. "The Demand for Bad Policy when Voters Underappreciate Equilibrium Effects," NBER Working Papers 22916, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Dal Bó, Ernesto & Dal Bó, Pedro & Eyster, Erik, 2018. "The demand for bad policy when voters underappreciate equilibrium effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 74455, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Stefano DellaVigna & Woojin Kim & Elizabeth Linos, 2024.
"Bottlenecks for Evidence Adoption,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(8), pages 2748-2789.
- Stefano DellaVigna & Woojin Kim & Elizabeth Linos, 2022. "Bottlenecks for Evidence Adoption," NBER Working Papers 30144, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- repec:feb:artefa:0106 is not listed on IDEAS
- Dur, Robert A J, 2001.
"Why Do Policy Makers Stick to Inefficient Decisions?,"
Public Choice, Springer, vol. 107(3-4), pages 221-234, June.
- Robert A.J. Dur, 1999. "Why Do Policy Makers Stick to Inefficient Decisions?," Public Economics 9906002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Robert A.J. Dur, 1999. "Why do Policy Makers stick to Inefficient Decisions?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-050/1, Tinbergen Institute.
- Andreas Bernecker & Pierre C. Boyer & Christina Gathmann, 2021.
"The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the US Welfare Reform,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 26-57, May.
- Andreas Bernecker & Pierre C. Boyer & Christina Gathmann, 2018. "The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the U.S. Welfare Reform," CESifo Working Paper Series 6964, CESifo.
- Boyer, Pierre & Bernecker, Andreas & ,, 2019. "The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the U.S. Welfare Reform," CEPR Discussion Papers 13763, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Fischer, Mira & Grewenig, Elisabeth & Lergetporer, Philipp & Werner, Katharina & Zeidler, Helen, 2024.
"The E-word – On the public acceptance of experiments,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
- Fischer, Mira & Grewenig, Elisabeth & Lergetporer, Philipp & Werner, Katharina, 2019. "The E-Word – On the Public Acceptance of Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 219, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Fischer, Mira & Grewenig, Elisabeth & Lergetporer, Philipp & Werner, Katharina & Zeidler, Helen, 2023. "The E-Word – On the Public Acceptance of Experiments," IZA Discussion Papers 16511, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Mira Fischer & Elisabeth Grewenig & Philipp Lergetporer & Katharina Werner & Helen Zeidler, 2023. "The E-Word – On the Public Acceptance of Experiments," Munich Papers in Political Economy 31, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
- Mira Fischer & Elisabeth Grewenig & Philipp Lergetporer & Katharina Werner & Helen Zeidler, 2023. "The E-Word - On the Public Acceptance of Experiments," CESifo Working Paper Series 10707, CESifo.
- Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2023.
"Designing Information Provision Experiments,"
Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 3-40, March.
- Ingar K. Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2020. "Designing Information Provision Experiments," CESifo Working Paper Series 8406, CESifo.
- Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2020. "Designing Information Provision Experiments," CEBI working paper series 20-20, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
- Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher & Wohlfart, Johannes, 2020. "Designing Information Provision Experiments," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 484, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
- Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher & Wohlfart. Johannes, 2020. "Designing Information Provision Experiments," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1275, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Gary Charness & Anya Samek & Jeroen Ven, 2022. "What is considered deception in experimental economics?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 385-412, April.
- Millner, Antony & Ollivier, Hélène & Simon, Leo, 2014.
"Policy experimentation, political competition, and heterogeneous beliefs,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 84-96.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier & Leo Simon, 2014. "Policy experimentation, political competition, and heterogeneous beliefs," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01308618, HAL.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier & Leo Simon, 2014. "Policy experimentation, political competition, and heterogeneous beliefs," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-01308618, HAL.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier & Leo Simon, 2014. "Policy experimentation, political competition and heterogeneous beliefs," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01022728, HAL.
- Millner, Antony & Ollivier, Hélène & Simon, Leo, 2014. "Policy experimentation, political competition, and heterogeneous beliefs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60133, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Antony Millner & Helene Ollivier & Leo Simon, 2014. "Policy experimentation, political competition, and heterogeneous beliefs," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14050, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier & Leo Simon, 2014. "Policy Experimentation, Political Competition, and Heterogeneous Beliefs," CESifo Working Paper Series 4839, CESifo.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier & Leo Simon, 2014. "Policy experimentation, political competition, and heterogeneous beliefs," Post-Print hal-01308618, HAL.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier & Leo Simon, 2014. "Policy experimentation, political competition and heterogeneous beliefs," Post-Print halshs-01022728, HAL.
- Broockman, David E. & Skovron, Christopher, 2018. "Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(3), pages 542-563, August.
- Vivalt, Eva & Coville, Aidan, 2023. "How do policymakers update their beliefs?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
- Carattini, Stefano & Baranzini, Andrea & Lalive, Rafael, 2018.
"Is Taxing Waste a Waste of Time? Evidence from a Supreme Court Decision,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 131-151.
- Stefano Carattini & Andrea Baranzini & Rafael Lalive, 2016. "Is Taxing Waste a Waste of Time? Evidence From a Supreme Court Decision," GRI Working Papers 227, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
- Carattini, Stefano & Baranzini, Andrea & Lalive, Rafael, 2018. "Is taxing waste a waste of time? Evidence from a Supreme Court decision," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88337, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina & Dorsch, Michael T. & Maarek, Paul, 2021.
"The politics of experimentation: Political competition and randomized controlled trials,"
Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21.
- Cristina Corduneanu-Huci & Michael T. Dorsch & Paul Maarek, 2021. "The politics of experimentation: Political competition and randomized controlled trials," Post-Print hal-04120428, HAL.
- Yokoo, Hide-Fumi & 横尾, 英史, 2020. "Ethics of randomized field experiments: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment," Discussion Papers 2020-07, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
- Karolin Soontjens & Julie Sevenans, 2022. "Electoral incentives make politicians respond to voter preferences: Evidence from a survey experiment with members of Parliament in Belgium," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1125-1139, September.
- Bruno Strulovici, 2010.
"Learning While Voting: Determinants of Collective Experimentation,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 933-971, May.
- Bruno Strulovici, 2008. "Learning while voting: determinants of collective experimentation," Economics Papers 2008-W08, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
- Rachel Glennerster & Kudzai Takavarasha, 2013. "Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10085.
- Steven Callander & Patrick Hummel, 2014. "Preemptive Policy Experimentation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1509-1528, July.
- Kalla, Joshua L. & Porter, Ethan, 2021. "Correcting Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion Among American Elected Officials: Results from Two Field Experiments," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 1792-1800, October.
- Steven Callande & Bård Harstad, 2015.
"Experimentation in Federal Systems,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(2), pages 951-1002.
- Steven Callander & Bård Harstad, 2013. "Experimentation in Federal Systems," NBER Working Papers 19601, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- John List, 2008. "Informed consent in social science," Artefactual Field Experiments 00086, The Field Experiments Website.
- Naurin, Elin & Öhberg, Patrik, 2021. "Ethics in Elite Experiments: A Perspective of Officials and Voters," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(2), pages 890-898, April.
- Robert Mislavsky & Berkeley Dietvorst & Uri Simonsohn, 2020. "Critical Condition: People Don’t Dislike a Corporate Experiment More Than They Dislike Its Worst Condition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1092-1104, November.
- Butler, Daniel M. & Nickerson, David W., 2011. "Can Learning Constituency Opinion Affect How Legislators Vote? Results from a Field Experiment," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 6(1), pages 55-83, August.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Xie, Yinxi & Xie, Yang, 2017. "Machiavellian experimentation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 685-711.
- Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Lergetporer & Justus Nover & Katharina Werner, 2023.
"Transparency and Policy Competition: Experimental Evidence from German Citizens and Politicians,"
Munich Papers in Political Economy
27, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
- Blesse, Sebastian & Lergetporer, Philipp & Nover, Justus & Werner, Katharina, 2023. "Transparency and policy competition: Experimental evidence from German citizens and politicians," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-007, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Lergetporer & Justus Nover & Katharina Werner, 2023. "Transparency and Policy Competition: Experimental Evidence from German Citizens and Politicians," CESifo Working Paper Series 10292, CESifo.
- Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Lergetporer & Justus Nover & Katharina Werner, 2023. "Transparency and Policy Competition: Experimental Evidence from German Citizens and Politicians," ifo Working Paper Series 390, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
- Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Lergetporer & Justus Nover & Katharina Werner, 2023. "Transparency and Policy Competition: Experimental Evidence from German Citizens and Politicians," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 387, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier, 2016.
"Beliefs, Politics, and Environmental Policy,"
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 226-244.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier, 2015. "Beliefs, politics, and environmental policy," GRI Working Papers 203, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier, 2016. "Beliefs, Politics, and Environmental Policy," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02459413, HAL.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier, 2016. "Beliefs, Politics, and Environmental Policy," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02459413, HAL.
- Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier, 2016. "Beliefs, Politics, and Environmental Policy," Post-Print halshs-02459413, HAL.
- Grosch, Kerstin & Haeckl, Simone & Rau, Holger & Preuss, Paul, 2023. "A Guide to Conducting School Experiments: Expert Insights and Best Practices for Effective Implementation," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2023/2, University of Stavanger.
- Bowen, Renee & Hwang, Ilwoo & Krasa, Stefan, 2022.
"Personal power dynamics in bargaining,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
- Renee Bowen & Ilwoo Hwang & Stefan Krasa, 2020. "Personal Power Dynamics in Bargaining," NBER Working Papers 27981, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hwang, Ilwoo, 2023. "Policy experimentation with repeated elections," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 623-644.
- Alonso, Ricardo & Câmara, Odilon, 2016.
"Political disagreement and information in elections,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 390-412.
- Alonso, Ricardo & Câmara, Odilon, 2016. "Political disagreement and information in elections," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68393, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Doruk Cetemen & Can Urgun & Leeat Yariv, 2023.
"Collective Progress: Dynamics of Exit Waves,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(9), pages 2402-2450.
- Doruk Cetemen & Can Urgun & Leeat Yariv, 2021. "Collective Progress: Dynamics of Exit Waves," Working Papers 2021-34, Princeton University. Economics Department..
- Doruk Cetemen & Can Urgun & Leeat Yariv, 2021. "Collective Progress: Dynamics of Exit Waves," NBER Working Papers 29008, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Doruk Cetemen & Can Urgun & Leeat Yariv, 2021. "Collective Progress: Dynamics of Exit Waves," Papers 2107.00406, arXiv.org.
- Yariv, Leeat & Cetemen, Doruk & Urgun, Can, 2021. "Collective Progress: Dynamics of Exit Waves," CEPR Discussion Papers 16341, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth, 2023.
"Beliefs about Racial Discrimination and Support for Pro-Black Policies,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(1), pages 40-53, January.
- Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher, 2019. "Beliefs About Racial Discrimination and Support for Pro-Black Policies," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 2/2019, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
- Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher, 2021. "Beliefs About Racial Discrimination and Support for Pro-Black Policies," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 554, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
- Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher, 2021. "Beliefs about racial discrimination and support for pro-black policies," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1339, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth, 2019. "Beliefs about Racial Discrimination and Support for Pro-Black Policies," CESifo Working Paper Series 7828, CESifo.
- Sandro Ambuehl & Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Doerrenberg & Christoph Feldhaus & Axel Ockenfels, 2023.
"Politicians’ Social Welfare Criteria – An Experiment with German Legislators,"
ifo Working Paper Series
391, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
- Sandro Ambuehl & Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Doerrenberg & Christoph Feldhaus & Axel Ockenfels, 2023. "Politicians' Social Welfare Criteria: An Experiment with German Legislators," CESifo Working Paper Series 10329, CESifo.
- Ambuehl, Sandro & Blesse, Sebastian & Doerrenberg, Philipp & Feldhaus, Christoph & Ockenfels, Axel, 2023. "Politicians' social welfare criteria - An experiment with German legislators," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-013, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Hwang, Ilwoo & Krasa, Stefan, 2023. "Leadership ability and agenda choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 179-192.
- Janne Tukiainen & Sebastian Blesse & Albrecht Bohne & Leonardo M. Giuffrida & Jan Jäässkeläinen & Ari Luukinen & Antti Sieppi, 2021.
"What Are the Priorities of Bureaucrats? Evidence from Conjoint Experiments with Procurement Officials,"
EconPol Working Paper
63, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
- Janne Tukiainen & Sebastian Blesse & Albrecht Bohne & Leonardo M. Giuffrida & Jan Jääskeläinen & Ari Luukinen & Antti Sieppi, 2023. "What Are the Priorities of Bureaucrats? Evidence from Conjoint Experiments with Procurement Officials," CESifo Working Paper Series 10199, CESifo.
- Tukiainen, Janne & Blesse, Sebastian & Bohne, Albrecht & Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Jääskeläinen, Jan & Luukinen, Ari & Sieppi, Antti, 2021. "What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-033, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Andreas Bernecker & Pierre C. Boyer & Christina Gathmann, 2021.
"The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the US Welfare Reform,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 26-57, May.
- Andreas Bernecker & Pierre C. Boyer & Christina Gathmann, 2018. "The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the U.S. Welfare Reform," CESifo Working Paper Series 6964, CESifo.
- Boyer, Pierre & Bernecker, Andreas & ,, 2019. "The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the U.S. Welfare Reform," CEPR Discussion Papers 13763, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Lergetporer, Philipp & Woessmann, Ludger, 2023.
"Earnings information and public preferences for university tuition: Evidence from representative experiments,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
- Lergetporer, Philipp & Woessmann, Ludger, 2021. "Earnings Information and Public Preferences for University Tuition: Evidence from Representative Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 294, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Philipp Lergetporer & Ludger Woessmann, 2021. "Earnings Information and Public Preferences for University Tuition: Evidence from Representative Experiments," CESifo Working Paper Series 9102, CESifo.
- Lergetporer, Philipp & Woessmann, Ludger, 2021. "Earnings Information and Public Preferences for University Tuition: Evidence from Representative Experiments," IZA Discussion Papers 14386, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Bowen, T. Renee & Krasa, Stefan & Hwang, Ilwoo, 2020. "Agenda-Setter Power Dynamics: Learning in Multi-Issue Bargaining," CEPR Discussion Papers 15406, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- T. Renee Bowen & George Georgiadis & Nicolas S. Lambert, 2019.
"Collective Choice in Dynamic Public Good Provision,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 243-298, February.
- Bowen, T. Renee & Georgiadis, George & Lambert, Nicolas, 2016. "Collective Choice in Dynamic Public Good Provision," CEPR Discussion Papers 11602, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- T. Renee Bowen & George Georgiadis & Nicolas S. Lambert, 2016. "Collective Choice in Dynamic Public Good Provision," NBER Working Papers 22772, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Binswanger, Johannes & Oechslin, Manuel, 2020. "Better statistics, better economic policies?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
- Bowen, T. Renee & Georgiadis, George & Lambert, Nicolas S., 2015.
"Collective Choice in Dynamic Public Good Provision: Real versus Formal Authority,"
Research Papers
3346, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Nicolas Lambert & George Georgiadis & Renee Bowen, 2016. "Collective Choice in Dynamic Public Good Provision: Real versus Formal Authority," 2016 Meeting Papers 197, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Ewald, Jens & Sterner, Thomas & Sterner, Erik, 2022. "Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
- Toma, Mattie & Bell, Elizabeth, 2024. "Understanding and increasing policymakers’ sensitivity to program impact," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
More about this item
Keywords
policy experiments; randomized controlled trials; voters; politicians; public policy; survey experiment; conformism.;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
- D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CDM-2023-05-29 (Collective Decision-Making)
- NEP-DES-2023-05-29 (Economic Design)
- NEP-EUR-2023-05-29 (Microeconomic European Issues)
- NEP-EXP-2023-05-29 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-HPE-2023-05-29 (History and Philosophy of Economics)
- NEP-POL-2023-05-29 (Positive Political Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20230027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.