IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tik/wparch/1987107.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structural Changes in International Trade - who gain, who lose?

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Fagerberg

    (Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the structural changes in OECD trade between 1961 and 1983. It is shown that trade in R&D- intensive products, based on relatively recent innovations, grew much faster than trade in other products. This caused the structure of OECD trade to change in a way most favorable for the technologically most advanced countries of the OECD area. But diffusion of technology at the same time provided countries on a lower level of technological and economic development with the opportunity of increasing market shares through structural change (adaptation), imitation and exploitation of cost advantages. In general, the latter type of effects outweighed the former. The main losers in this process were countries with a high level of income and costs, but a low level of innovative activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Fagerberg, 1987. "Structural Changes in International Trade - who gain, who lose?," Working Papers Archives 1987107, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
  • Handle: RePEc:tik:wparch:1987107
    Note: Originally published as NUPI report no.107, May 1987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tik.uio.no/InnoWP/archive/wpno107-1987.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Fagerberg & Ådne Cappelen & Lars Mjöset, 1992. "Structural change and economic policy: the Norwegian model under pressure," Working Papers Archives 1992456, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    2. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin & Knell, Mark, 2007. "The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1595-1620, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tik:wparch:1987107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tkuiono.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: H&kon Normann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tkuiono.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.