IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The paths of classical political economy and Walrasian economics through Bowles and Gintis’ rendering of post Walrasian economics

Listed author(s):
  • John H. Finch

    (Department of Economics, University of Aberdeen, Scotland)

  • Robert McMaster

    (Department of Economics, University of Aberdeen, Scotland)

Registered author(s):

    Bowles and Gintis have, over the last twenty-five years, contributed to a Post Walrasian approach to economics drawing upon this in making policy recommendations concerning institutional design and the distribution of productive resources in society. We establish that Post Walrasian Economics is a broadly coherent system of thought, with two distinct phases, contested exchange and evolution, that Bowles and Gintis consider addresses what they term as Walras’ fiction, i.e., the Walrasian system only offers a relationship between ‘things’ as opposed to humans. Nevertheless, we argue that they perpetrate their own fiction through an inherently reductionist framework.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by SCEME in its series SCEME Working Papers: Advances in Economic Methodology with number 009/2005.

    in new window

    Length: 34 pages
    Date of creation: Jan 2005
    Handle: RePEc:sti:wpaper:009/2005
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sti:wpaper:009/2005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Matthias Klaes)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.