IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ssb/dispap/969.html

Alternatives to paying child benefit to the rich. means testing or higher tax?

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 implies that the US is effectively moving towards a general child benefit. However, the amount paid out is dependent on income, similar to schemes in several other countries. In the present paper, we argue that instead of suppressing the labour supply of middle income parents through withdrawing the transfer as a function of income, one should consider the obvious alternative of financing a generous universal child benefit by changing the overall income tax system. Implications of means testing relative to a tax financed universal alternative are discussed analytically in a piece-wise linear schedule. Moreover, we provide empirical illustrations of effects of child benefit design by combining information from behavioral and non-behavioral microsimulation models, representing the universe of Norwegian households. Results from both the analytical discussion and the simulations question the case for letting the child benefit be means tested.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Apps & Ray Rees & Thor O. Thoresen & Trine E. Vattø, 2021. "Alternatives to paying child benefit to the rich. means testing or higher tax?," Discussion Papers 969, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssb:dispap:969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssb.no/en/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/trygd-og-stonad/artikler/alternatives-to-paying-child-benefit-to-the-rich-means-testing-or-higher-tax/_/attachment/inline/9d898355-df32-450a-810f-b8afbf8dc14e:b7a33020074d9b9333995b62b783fba10d48a7a0/DP969_web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Trine Engh Vattø & Kjersti Misje Østbakken, 2024. "Do means-tested childcare subsidies discourage work?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 1-31, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssb:dispap:969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: L Maasø (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbgvno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.