IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/spa/wpaper/2019wpecon09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Drought response in an election year: Evidence from Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio R. Lucinda
  • David Grover, Sejal Patel

Abstract

Research on the impact of water conservation instruments rarely considers the role of electoral politics. This paper evaluates the response of a major state-owned water utility to the drought that occurred in the city of São Paulo, Brazil during 2014. The response coincided with an election for state governor. A difference-in-difference research design produces no evidence that a reward-based instrument implemented before the election reduced household consumption. Evidence is found that a penalty-based instrument implemented after the election reduced consumption by 4 to 8%. The implications of insulating water utilities’ drought response from the political-electoral cycle are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio R. Lucinda & David Grover, Sejal Patel, 2019. "Drought response in an election year: Evidence from Brazil," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2019_09, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
  • Handle: RePEc:spa:wpaper:2019wpecon09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.repec.eae.fea.usp.br/documentos/Lucinda_Grover_Patel_09WP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Water conservation; policy instrument design; political budget cycles; drought;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H12 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Crisis Management
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spa:wpaper:2019wpecon09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pedro Garcia Duarte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.