IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/tpaper/009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions: A Critical Literacy Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Cherubini

    (Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario)

Abstract

The education of Aboriginal youth is, in some respects, in crisis. Aboriginal communities in Ontario are as a group currently experiencing marginalization within the education system. As such it is imperative that efforts be made to better understand the system to improve the success rate for Aboriginal youth. The Ontario First Nation, Métis and Inuit Education Policy Framework (2007) has committed to “improve achievement among First Nation, Métis and Inuit students and to close the gap between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students†. English and Language Arts teachers are compelled to consider how the policy discourse of the 2007 Aboriginal Policy Framework implicates upon the socio-political and socio-historical currency of literacy in their instruction. Consequently, this qualitative study examined one component of a large-scale project, in the tradition of grounded theory, including the implications of Aboriginal education policy discourse on literacy instruction as it applies to over 200 prospective teachers enrolled in a Teacher Education Program in Ontario, Canada. Participants identified two themes that they believed Aboriginal students would find most challenging, including: tension with provincial curriculum and, feelings of misrepresentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Cherubini, 2018. "Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions: A Critical Literacy Framework," Proceedings of the 8th International RAIS Conference, March 26-27, 2018 009, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:tpaper:009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/009March.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aboriginal students; critical literacy; education policy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:tpaper:009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.