IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/7508617.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Frequent Use Of Emergency Departments: An Application To The Paediatric Context

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Leporatti

    (University of Genoa - Department of Political Science ?)

  • Enrico di Bella

    (University of Genoa ? Department of Economics)

  • Luca Gandullia

    (University of Genoa - Department of Political Science ?)

  • Walter Locatelli

    (Alisa Regione Liguria)

  • Marcello Montefiori

    (University of Genoa ? Department of Economics)

  • Roberta Zanetti

    (Alisa Regione Liguria)

Abstract

Frequent users of Emergency Departments (EDs) represent a particularly interesting category of users since they account to a small percentage of patients but they affect considerably accesses, overcrowding and the overall costs of ED activities. The literature on the topic is vast and it allows to delineate a profile of frequent users identifying socio-demographic (age, gender, nationality) and clinical (chronic diseases, drugs and alcohol abuse; psychic illnesses) risk factors. However, most of the studies on the topic limit the analysis to one-year period or to a single study site and there is no consensus on the definition of frequent use. Frequent users are generally defined as those patients reporting a number of accesses per year beyond a certain threshold. The selection of the threshold is often based on previous literature or on percentiles but the definitions vary considerably and the choice tends to be subjective.In this study, the focus will be placed on paediatric patients, with reference to which the contributions in the literature are still very limited. The objective is to identify the most important drivers of ED frequent use in the 19 EDs of Liguria region (Italy) during a three-year period (2013-2015). The dataset contains 287,242 accesses referred to 144,895 under 14 patients and it includes information on patients? characteristics and on their clinical pathway. To overcome the limitations connected to previous definitions of frequent use, we exploit the availability of data on three years; this allows to define, not only frequent use, but also its duration (i.e. One-shot / Multiple shot frequent use) and intensity (Normal, High, Very high). By the use of logit and multinomial logit regressions we identify a set of risk factors associated to frequent use and to the different forms of frequent use. Results show that even if frequent users represent a small share of patients (9%) they contribute to roughly 25% of accesses. Chronic conditions are the most relevant determinants of frequent use (particularly mental disorders, diseases of the respiratory system) but also foreign nationality turns out to be an important predictor. Differences emerge in the impact of regressors on the different forms of frequent use defined according to its duration and intensity.The study represents an important tool to support policy-making and to discriminate between the potentially preventable frequent use (i.e. inappropriate use) and that associated to complex medical conditions, such as chronic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Leporatti & Enrico di Bella & Luca Gandullia & Walter Locatelli & Marcello Montefiori & Roberta Zanetti, 2018. "Frequent Use Of Emergency Departments: An Application To The Paediatric Context," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 7508617, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7508617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/iises-annual-conference-sevilla/table-of-content/detail?cid=75&iid=029&rid=8617
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Frequent use; Emergency Departments; Risk factors; paediatric patients;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • C50 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7508617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.