IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/7010076.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Correlation Investigation: The Cognitive Reflection Test and the Math National Evaluation scores

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Tamas

    (Center of International Business and Economics; The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

Purpose - the aim of the paper is to assess the relationship between the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) scores and the Math National Evaluation scores.Design/methodology/approach - statistical analyze and econometric methods, using SPSS, the Pearson correlation; critical assessment of literature review; quantitative methods.Findings - there is a significant, strong and positive correlation between the Math National Evaluation scores and the Cognitive Reflection Test scores, in both versions, the original CRT and the 10 items LCRT (Long Cognitive Reflection Test). Practical implications ? optional courses focused on logical reasoning could have a positive impact on Math National Evaluation scores.Originality/value ? to the author?s knowledge, this is the first analysis of the relationship between CRT scores and Math scores at secondary school level.Limitations - the participants were only from the Eastern part of Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Tamas, 2018. "Correlation Investigation: The Cognitive Reflection Test and the Math National Evaluation scores," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 7010076, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7010076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/42nd-international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=70&iid=045&rid=10076
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cognitive Reflection Test; Math National Evaluation scores;

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7010076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.