IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/7009773.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Between a Combinative Perspective and Self-Contained Practice: A Critical Review of Ethnomethodology

Author

Listed:
  • Giray Gerim

    (Eötvös Loránd University)

Abstract

Ethnomethodology (EM) brought a new vision to social studies by putting the construction of social reality through everyday life and practices of the members of society at the center and questioning what is taken granted conventionally in social research. However, it is doubtful if EM possesses a systematic and comprehensive approach to explain the social world extensively as a fully-fledged practice or framework of analysis. Moreover, it shows a very fragmented structure regarding the studies in the field. Based on these aspects, this article problematizes the extent of EM?s contribution to social analysis. The argument of this work is that it is not suitable to be considered a separate framework of social analysis due to the drawbacks mentioned; nevertheless it has a significant potential to contribute to the examination of social reality if it is integrated into the theoretical and/or methodological frameworks of social analyses as a perspective. The argument is defended through critical reading of the primary and secondary sources which deals with EM theoretically and also discussing some studies which can be regarded as its applications in social research.

Suggested Citation

  • Giray Gerim, 2018. "Between a Combinative Perspective and Self-Contained Practice: A Critical Review of Ethnomethodology," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 7009773, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7009773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/42nd-international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=70&iid=012&rid=9773
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social analysis; ethnomethodology; ethnomethodological perspective; ethnomethodological approaches;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General
    • Y90 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Other - - - Other
    • Y80 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines - - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7009773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.