IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/5908316.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Strategy for Excavating Best Practice of Scientific and Cultural Contents

Author

Listed:
  • Jaeho Lee

    (Gyeoing National University of Education)

  • Jaekwoun Shim

    (Korea University)

  • Hyunkyung Shin

    (Gachon University)

  • Gayoung Lee

    (Korea Foundation for the Advanced of Science & Creativity)

  • Junggyu Lee

    (Korea Foundation for the Advanced of Science & Creativity)

Abstract

Since the 1960s, the Korean Government has been carrying out various projects aiming at the popularization of science. The science popularization projects conducted by the Korean Government could be classified by the ages as follows. 1960s was the beginning stage, 1970s and 1980s was the formation stage, and from 1990s can be regarded as the extension stage of scientific and cultural activities. The Korean government's science popularization project has encountered a great turning point in 2016. The most important reason for this turning point is the beginning of a new paradigm by the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Under such circumstances, the Korean government is in the process of establishing a strategy for developing, disseminating, and managing scientific and cultural contents suitable for the Fourth Industrial Revolution era. In order to achieve such the project?s goal successfully, we have benchmarked the best practices of scientific and cultural contents. Benchmarking strategy for excavating the best practice of scientific and cultural contents proceeded step by step as follows. First, benchmarking countries were selected. To this end, the R&D investment cost ratios in terms of GDP, national science and technology innovation competency rankings, and national brand ranks have been considered in total. Five benchmarking countries were selected based on these evaluation criteria, and the results were the United States, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, and China. Second, we proposed an analytical framework for excavating best practices in scientific and cultural contents. The proposed analytical framework for analyzing scientific and cultural contents was designed to analyze the service types of contents, the country of production, the field of study, the user types of contents service, technological areas related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and learning value. In this paper the technical fields related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution were classified as follows. AR(Argumented Reality)/VR(Virtual Reality)/MR(Mixed Reality), Artificial Intelligence(AI), ICBM(Internet of Things, Cloud, Big Data, Mobile), Robot and so on.?This research was supported by Korea Foundation for the Advancement Science & Creativity(KOFAC)?

Suggested Citation

  • Jaeho Lee & Jaekwoun Shim & Hyunkyung Shin & Gayoung Lee & Junggyu Lee, 2017. "Strategy for Excavating Best Practice of Scientific and Cultural Contents," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 5908316, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:5908316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/34th-international-academic-conference-florence/table-of-content/detail?cid=59&iid=030&rid=8316
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    science popularization; scientific and cultural contents; the Fourth Industrial Revolution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:5908316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.