IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/3505977.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are E-Petitions Operative for Change? On the Effectiveness and the Transformative Potential of E-Petitioning

Author

Listed:
  • Oya Morva

    (Istanbul University)

Abstract

During the last decade, with the progress of new information and communication technologies, electronic petitioning systems have emerged as a productive way for individuals to communicate with the authorities or policy makers about diverse issues. Although, they are designed to enable citizens to influence decision?making in the policy making process, there is an ongoing discussion on their effectiveness: one side of this discussion regards e-petitions as a new form of activism that enables greater political participation, and hence fortifies democracy. According to this view, e-petition campaigns can be an operative tool to help citizens to put issues on the political agenda, they are capable of producing a desired result, and thus they can cause a change over and transform political decisions. On the other side of this discussion, there is an opposite view that considers the transformative potential of an online petition as very moderate. Within this study, this transformative potential, the effectiveness of e-petitions, is discussed and analysed. With this aim, the paper uses the case studies from change.org.tr to determine the extent to which e-petitioning worked when ending a campaign successfully.

Suggested Citation

  • Oya Morva, 2016. "Are E-Petitions Operative for Change? On the Effectiveness and the Transformative Potential of E-Petitioning," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 3505977, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:3505977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/22nd-international-academic-conference-lisbon/table-of-content/detail?cid=35&iid=039&rid=5977
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    online petitions; e-petitions; e-petitioning; effectiveness; change.org;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:3505977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.