IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/16117367.html

Who Really Uses Platform Sharing? Mapping Consumer Motivations, Preferences, and Actual Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Opálková

    (Mendel University Brno)

Abstract

The sharing economy (SE) has evolved from an emerging and disruptive phenomenon into an increasingly established component of contemporary consumption. Digital platforms have substantially expanded consumers? access to shared goods and services, creating new opportunities for economically, socially, and environmentally oriented forms of consumption. As the SE becomes increasingly normalized, however, consumers are unlikely to constitute a homogeneous market. Understanding how consumers differ in their perceptions, preferences, and actual participation is therefore important for identifying the factors underlying the continued adoption and development of sharing-based consumption. This study aimed to identify distinct consumer segments in the Czech sharing economy and to characterize them according to their perceptions of SE, ownership preferences, actual participation, and selected socioeconomic characteristics. Data were obtained through a quantitative representative survey of 700 Czech respondents. Consumer segments were identified using k-means cluster analysis, with the optimal number of clusters determined using the elbow method. The analysis identified three substantively distinct consumer segments that differed not only in their perceptions of SE but also in the extent to which these perceptions translated into actual participation. The largest segment (52.3%), labelled ambivalent pragmatists, recognized the economic and functional benefits of sharing while retaining a relatively strong preference for ownership and exhibiting an intermediate level of actual participation. Ownership-oriented sceptics (24.0%) combined strong ownership preferences with consistently unfavourable evaluations of SE and represented the least active segment in both consumption and provision. In contrast, actively engaged consumers (23.7%) expressed broadly favourable evaluations of the economic, functional, social, and environmental value of sharing and demonstrated the highest levels of actual participation across both user and provider roles. This segment was relatively more urban and economically active, whereas the sceptical segment included a substantially higher proportion of older and retired respondents. Overall, the findings indicate that consumer engagement with the sharing economy follows a continuum from ownership-oriented scepticism and behavioural disengagement, through pragmatic but only partially realized acceptance, to active participation. The results highlight the importance of distinguishing between consumers? perceived value of sharing and their actual behavioural engagement when assessing the development of the sharing economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Opálková, 0000. "Who Really Uses Platform Sharing? Mapping Consumer Motivations, Preferences, and Actual Choices," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 16117367, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:16117367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/iises-international-academic-conference-vienna-2026/table-of-content/detail?cid=161&iid=009&rid=17367
    File Function: First version, 0000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:16117367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.