IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/15616937.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Standard Of Proof In Civil Proceedings: A Comparative Perspective Between European Countries And The Echr Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Brunela Kullolli

    (Faculty of Political Sciences and Law, ?Aleksander Moisiu? University of Durres)

Abstract

This article explores the standards of evidence in civil proceedings from a comparative perspective between the civil law system (with a focus on Albania) and the common law system (with a focus on the United Kingdom). Combining theoretical and practical approaches, the study examines the core principles governing the administration and evaluation of evidence, the role of the judge and the parties, and the rules on admissibility and exclusion of evidence. The analysis is grounded in relevant national legislation, leading jurisprudence, and key judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. The article concludes by identifying structural weaknesses in the Albanian system and offers concrete recommendations for aligning it with European standards and ensuring a fair and effective civil trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Brunela Kullolli, 0000. "The Standard Of Proof In Civil Proceedings: A Comparative Perspective Between European Countries And The Echr Practice," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 15616937, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:15616937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/iises-international-academic-conference-prague-156/table-of-content/detail?cid=156&iid=009&rid=16937
    File Function: First version, 0000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • K49 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:15616937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.