IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/see/wpaper/75.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Research and Development and Competitiveness in South Eastern Europe: Asset or Liability for EU Integration?

Author

Listed:
  • Slavo Radosevic

    (UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies)

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between research and development (R&D) and competitiveness of the SEE economies from the perspective of the EU integration and the EU as a knowledge based economy. Specifically, the paper addresses the question of whether SEE is a potential asset or a liability in this process. SEE countries are quite diverse in terms of levels of competitiveness, with visible effects on the role of R&D which is confirmed by analysis of the demand and supply factors of R&D. Although tentative, results show that innovation policy that takes account of the supply and demand side factors of R&D is essential to knowledge based growth in the SEE economies. This poses some limits to traditionally defined S&T policy as a sectoral activity and calls for new approaches, which are discussed in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Slavo Radosevic, 2007. "Research and Development and Competitiveness in South Eastern Europe: Asset or Liability for EU Integration?," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 75, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    • Handle: RePEc:see:wpaper:75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/17476/1/17476.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Gerry & Carmen A. Li, 2004. "Revisiting Consumption Smoothing and the 1998 Russian Crisis," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 43, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    2. Mickiewicz, Tomasz & Gerry, Christopher J. & Bishop, Kate, 2005. "Privatisation, corporate control and employment growth: Evidence from a panel of large Polish firms, 1996-2002," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 98-119, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kate Bishop, 2006. "Knowledge based entrepreneurship in the Czech Republic and Hungary: results from 4 case studies," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 71, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    2. Christopher J. Gerry & Eugene Nivorozhkin & John A. Rigg, 2008. "The great divide: 'ruralisation' of poverty in Russia," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 32(4), pages 593-607, July.
    3. Slavo Radosevic & Marat Myrzakhmet, 2006. "Between vision and reality: promoting innovation through technoparks in Kazakhstan," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 66, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    4. Tullio Buccellato, 2007. "Convergence across Russian regions: a spatial econometrics approach," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 72, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    5. Andrei Vernikov, 2007. "Corporate Governance and Control in Russian Banks," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 78, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    6. Slavo Radosevic, 2006. "Growth, Integration and Spillovers in the Central and East European Software Industry," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 69, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    7. Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar & Dimova, Ralitza & Nugent, Jeffrey B., 2011. "Off-farm labor supply and labor markets in rapidly changing circumstances: Bulgaria during transition," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 378-389, September.
    8. Lami, Endrit & Imami, Drini & Kächelein, Holger, 2016. "Fuelling political fiscal cycles by opportunistic privatization in transition economies: The case of Albania," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 220-231.
    9. Kenneth Wilson, 2008. "Party-system institutionalization and democracy: the case of Russia," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 91, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    10. Burdín, Gabriel & Dean, Andrés, 2012. "Revisiting the objectives of worker-managed firms: An empirical assessment," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 158-171.
    11. Violetta Parutis, 2006. "Construction of Home by Polish and Lithuanian Migrants in the UK," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 64, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    12. Zorica Kalezić, 2015. "Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in Transition Economies: Evidence from Montenegro," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 4(3), pages 5-64.
    13. Adam Sliwinski, 2006. "Ownership structure and development of Polish life insurance companies - evidence from 1991 to 2004," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 63, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    14. Karoly Fazekas & Gabor Kezdi (ed.), 2007. "The Hungarian Labour Market 2007," The Hungarian Labour Market Yearbooks, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, number 2007, December.
    15. Ben Salha, Ousama, 2013. "Does economic globalization affect the level and volatility of labor demand by skill? New insights from the Tunisian manufacturing industries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 572-597.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:see:wpaper:75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csescuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.