IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The combination of volatility forecasts

Listed author(s):
  • Alessandra Amendola


    (Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Salerno, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Storti

    (Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Salerno, Italy)

The main problem in the combination of volatility forecasts is that the volatility cannot be directly observed and hence loss functions such as the MSFE cannot be directly used unless a suitable proxy of the conditional variance is defined. A common approach is to use the squared returns but these offer a noisy measure of the volatility and, in many settings, their use can give rise to a non-consistent ranking of the candidate models. A more accurate approximation can be obtained by referring to the concept of realized volatility even if, at very high frequencies, micro-structure market frictions can distort such a measure of the unobserved volatility. Also, in many applications, high frequency data on the phenomenon of interest are not available and so realized volatility measures cannot be computed. For example, this usually happens when working with macroeconomic data for which the maximum sampling frequency is monthly. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we present a novel approach to the combination of volatility forecasts in which the optimal combination weights are estimated by the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) imposing appropriate conditions on the standardized residuals implied by a given set of combination weights. The aim is to constrain the standardized residuals to be as close as possible to a sequence of i.i.d. zero mean, unit variance random variables. Second, we suggest a Wald type test of forecast encompassing for volatility models and derive its asymptotic distribution. The finite sample properties of the proposed test statistics are investigated by means of a simulation study.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 with number 496.

in new window

Date of creation: 04 Jul 2006
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:496
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.