IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecfa/487.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating hedge fund managers: A Bayesian investigation of skill and persistence

Author

Listed:
  • Vrontos Ioannis

    (Athens University of Economics and Business)

  • Vrontos Spyridon

    (University of Aegean)

  • Giamouridis Daniel

    (Athens University of Economics and Business and Faculty of Finance, Cass Business School)

Abstract

The last couple of decades has witnessed a growing interest in hedge funds. Academics and practitioners are intrigued by the distinct characteristics of these investment vehicles: hedge funds are flexible with respect to the types of securities they hold and the type of positions they take; they are not subject to public disclosure of their activities; and they are not evaluated against a passive benchmark. Operating in this environment encourages hedge fund managers to construct highly dynamic trading strategies and as a result expose their portfolios to a plethora of economic risk factors. From the investor point of view, very little is known about the investment process, the economic risks associated with a particular hedge fund or a hedge fund strategy, and the skills of the hedge fund manager. While the details of the investment process could be of little practical importance to the investor, the latter – risks and managerial skill - are not. The objective of separating ‘alpha’ and ‘beta’ - the non-systematic and systematic components of returns respectively – is thus one of the main themes of current interest on hedge fund investing. This work introduces a Bayesian approach to estimate the ‘alpha’ and ‘beta’ of hedge fund investments. The Bayesian analysis consists of parameter estimation and model selection, and is implemented via Markov Chain Monte Carlo methodologies. The proposed stochastic search algorithm is appealing in identifying the relevant systematic risk factors in situations where the set of possible factors is very large, i.e. in hedge funds (‘black box’ investments). The entire analysis is carried out in a dynamic setup where hedge fund return volatilities change over time. We address two empirical questions. First we examine if the proposed methodology has an impact on the relative ranking of hedge fund managers compared with current approaches. Second, we study the nature of persistence in hedge fund return performance, i.e. short- or long-term. These questions are extremely interesting for the practice of hedge fund investing. A reliable ‘alpha’ estimation leads to more efficient manager selection schemes, i.e. fund of hedge funds or multi-strategy funds. In addition identifying the nature of persistence in hedge fund investment performance helps in determining successful portfolio rebalancing strategies (timing).

Suggested Citation

  • Vrontos Ioannis & Vrontos Spyridon & Giamouridis Daniel, 2006. "Evaluating hedge fund managers: A Bayesian investigation of skill and persistence," Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 487, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bayesian methods; Hedge Funds; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Manager skill;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.