Lag or Error? - Detecting the Nature of Spatial Correlation
The attractiveness of spatial autoregressive models has increased significantly. The awareness of important spatial interactions arose in various fields. In economics, interactions can be due to interdependencies between entities such as states, firms, or consumers. Examples are spatial interactions due to network effects, due to environmental circumstances, due to contagion problems, or due to market interdependencies. In politics the propagation of opinions has a spatial dimension. Even more naturally is the spatial correlation of geographical units. Vegetation patterns and snow cover distributions are specific examples in the latter vein. For many applications estimating a spatial correlation coefficient is useful to obtain white noise errors and therefore valid hypothesis test. However, often theory suggests the existence of spatial dependence in the endogeneous variable as in the examples of strategic behavior and the propagation of opinions. In these cases the parameter of the spatial dependent variable is of interest per se. Estimating spatial models â€“ like the spatial lag model, the spatial error model or even spatial autoregressive model with spatial autoregressive disturbances â€“ requires the specification of an appropriate weighting matrix. The necessary weighting matrix to capture the spatial dimension will be very different for each application. Dubin (2003) analyzed the severeness of a (model) misspecification resulting from an improper weighting matrix. Additionally, McMillen (2003) investigated the impact of an improper functional form of the model. In this article we analyze whether it is empirically possible to separate the effect of a spatial lag in the dependent variable from a spatial lag in the error term using maximum likelihood and generalized method of moments as estimation techniques. Therefore, a large Monte Carlo study is set up to investigate the consequences of a weighting matrix misspecification for the finite sample properties. Various specification tests are applied to check the models and to detect the most suitable weighting scheme using the information in the data
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.