IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Recovering from Crash States: A ''New'' Algorithm for Solving Dynamic Stochastic Macroeconomic Models

Listed author(s):
  • Viktor Dorofeenko


  • Gabriel S. Lee

    (University of Regensburg and IHS)

  • Kevin D. Salyer

    (UC Davis)

We introduce a ''new'' algorithm that can be used to solve stochastic dynamic general equilibrium models. This approach exploits the fact that the equations defining equilibrium can be viewed as set of algebraic equations in the neighborhood of the steady-state. Then a recursive scheme, which employes Upwind Gauss Seidel method at each step of iteration, can be used to determine the global solution. This method, within the context of a standard real business cycle model, is compared to projection, perturbation, and linearization approaches and is shown to be fast and globally accurate. Furthermore, we show that the gain in efficiency becomes more significant if the number of discrete states of the problem grows, and hence the method allows us to avoid the state space limitation. This comparison is done within a discrete state setting in which there is a low probability, crash state for the technology shock. Critically, this environment introduces heteroscedasticity in the technology shock and we show that linearization methods perform poorly in this environment even though the unconditional variance of shocks is relatively small and similar to that typically used in RBC analysis. We then use this solution method to analyze the equilibrium behavior of the crash state economy. We demonstrate that the welfare costs of a crash state are high and lead to a larger average capital stock due to precautionary savings. Also, we analyze the behavior of the term premia (both conditional and unconditional) and demonstrate how these affect the business cycle characteristics of the yield curve

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 with number 215.

in new window

Date of creation: 04 Jul 2006
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:215
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.