IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

General Equilibrium Implications of the Capital Adequacy Regulation for Banks

Listed author(s):
  • Roger Aliaga-Diaz


    (Economics North Carolina State University)

Capital adequacy regulations specify a minimum capital-to-assets ratio for banks in the economy. The effects of these regulations on the level of economic activity have not been thoroughly studied by the banking regulation literature. Specifically, the fact that as proposed by the Basle Accords, a constant ratio tying bank lending to bank equity may reinforce macroeconomic fluctuations has been looked at by only a few existing theoretical papers. This paper proposes a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model to study the interactions between the banking sector and the aggregate level of economic activity. Banks behavior is fully micro-founded. Banks financing decisions (equity versus deposits) are constrained not only by the regulation but also by a financial imperfection arising from the fact that during bad times banks find it difficult to recapitalize by raising equity. Thus, higher borrower bankruptcy rates during recessions imply that banks have to cut new loans until the ratio is restored to the required level. Since production firms can only imperfectly substitute bank lending with other forms of financing, a negative macroeconomic shock affects production and investment both directly and indirectly through the bank loan supply. This banking regulation and the financial imperfection imply two different constraints to the banks problem that bind only occasionally in the stochastic steady state. This prevents the use of standard linearization techniques to solve the model numerically. Alternatively, using some discretization of the state space methods such as Value Function Iteration is difficult because the model cannot be written in terms of a central planner problem. Following Fackler (2003) I solve the decentralized general equilibrium problem by using a very general Function Approximation technique that nests the Parameterized Expectation Approach as a particular case. The method allows to approximate numerically either the policy functions or the expectation functions. It is also flexible as regards the choice of approximating functions, including Chebyshev polynomials and piecewise polynomial splines. The technique relies on the Collocation Method to solve for the polynomial coefficients in combination with either generic root-finding algorithms or a fixed-point iteration scheme. Numerical results suggest that banks try to anticipate aggregate shocks by accumulating a buffer of capital over the regulatory minimum. Nevertheless, a series of bad shocks may be strong enough to eventually undermine these "reserves" and to make banks cut back on lending. This suggests the existence of a financial accelerator, since the supply of loans shrinks together with the demand during recessions. This mechanism has interesting policy implications and provides grounds for a procyclical value of the required capital-to-assets ratio

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 with number 238.

in new window

Date of creation: 11 Nov 2005
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:238
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.