Social Security evaluation: A critique
The objective of this work is to evaluate the impact of a social security system on the well-being of each individual in the economy and to challenge the measures commonly used in this type of policy analysis. We show that measures based on the notion of actuarial fairness do not measure correctly the impact that social security has on each individual's well-being. We study the bias of these measures by relating it to different sources of heterogeneity and to the impact of social security on individual's decisions and on factor prices. In order to correctly evaluate the impact of social security on the well-being of an individual we need to take into account that this policy affects her welfare in other ways than through its direct impact on her lifetime income. Social security influences her labor and savings decisions as well as factor prices, affecting leisure levels, labor income and the return to savings. In sum, this paper reinforces the belief that, in order to accurately evaluate how social security system affects the well-being of the individuals, we need to use a general equilibrium framework where we can account for all the repercussions of social security.
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||01 Apr 2001|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/conference/SCE2001/SCE2001.html|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf1:139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.