Social Security Evaluation: A Critique
The objective of this work is to evaluate the impact of a social security system on the well-being of each individual in the economy and to challenge the measures commonly used in this type of policy analysis. We show that measures based on the notion of actuarial fairness do not measure correctly the impact that social security has on each individual's well-being. We study the bias of these measures by relating it to different sources of heterogeneity and to the impact of social security on individual's decisions and on factor prices. In order to correctly evaluate the impact of social security on the well-being of an individual we need to take into account that this policy affects her welfare in other ways than through its direct impact on her lifetime income. Social security influences her labor and savings decisions as well as factor prices, affecting leisure levels, labor income and the return to savings. In sum, this paper reinforces the belief that, in order to accurately evaluate how social security system affects the well-being of the individuals, we need to use a general equilibrium framework where we can account for all the repercussions of social security.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
Volume (Year): 9 (2005)
Issue (Month): 01 (February)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK|
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_MDY
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:9:y:2005:i:01:p:57-97_04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.