IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rut/rutres/199906.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Defense Procurement On U.S. Manufacturing Productivity Growth

Author

Listed:
  • David Saal

    (Rutgers University and Middlesex University, UK)

Abstract

As the 20th Century ends, technologies originally developed for defense purposes such as computers and satellite communications appear to have become a driving force behind economic growth. Paradoxically, almost all econometric models suggest that the largely defense-oriented federal industrial R&D funding that helped create these technologies had no discernible effect on industrial productivity growth. This paper addresses this paradox by stressing that defense procurement and hence federal R&D expenditures were targeted to a few narrowly defined manufacturing sub sectors that produced high tech weaponry. Panel data analysis employing disaggregated data from the NBER Manufacturing Productivity Database and the BEA's Input Output tables then demonstrates that defense procurement did have significant positive effects on the productivity performance of disaggregated manufacturing industries.

Suggested Citation

  • David Saal, 1999. "The Impact of Defense Procurement On U.S. Manufacturing Productivity Growth," Departmental Working Papers 199906, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:rut:rutres:199906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alvin Birdi & Paul Dunne & David Saal, 2000. "The impact of arms production on the South African manufacturing industry," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 597-613.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    productivity;

    JEL classification:

    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rut:rutres:199906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/derutus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.