Comparing the accuracy of ABC and time-driven ABC in complex and dynamic environments: a simulation analysis
This paper compares the accuracy of traditional ABC and time-driven ABC in complex and dynamic environments through simulation analysis. First, when unit times in time-driven ABC are known or can be flawlessly estimated, time-driven ABC coincides with the benchmark system and in this case our results show that the overall accuracy of traditional ABC depends on (1) existing capacity utilization, (2) diversity in the actual mix of productive work, and (3) error in the estimated percentage mix. In particular, we find that when error in the estimated percentage mix is low (that is, when the ABC model is regularly adjusted to changes in activity driver volumes), growing unused capacity raises the inaccuracy of ABC, especially when diversity in the actual mix of productive work is high. When error in the estimated percentage mix is high, unused capacity may counterbalance some of the impact of this error but not entirely; the offsetting effect is highest when diversity in the actual mix of productive work is also high. Second, when unit times in time-driven ABC are subject to measurement error, we compare the overall accuracy of traditional ABC versus time-driven ABC and detect that when diversity in the actual mix of productive work is low, time-driven ABC tends to be more accurate than traditional ABC, especially at higher levels of unused capacity. Alternatively, when diversity in the actual mix of productive work is high, traditional ABC tends to be more accurate than time-driven ABC, especially at lower levels of unused capacity. Finally, it is noteworthy that the accuracy of traditional ABC compared to time-driven ABC increases in case of biased unit time estimates.
|Date of creation:||Mar 2010|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Hoveniersberg 4, B-9000 Gent|
Phone: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 34 61
Fax: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 35 92
Web page: http://www.ugent.be/eb
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:10/645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.