IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsc/rsceui/2012-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Adoption of Network Codes in the Field of Energy: Availability of Judicial Review in a Multi-Stage Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Charikleia Vlachou

Abstract

The adoption of network codes is a crucial step towards the conclusion of the internal energy market by the Creation-Date 2014. This paper aims to assess the availability of judicial review in the multi-stage procedure established by the Electricity and Gas Regulations. In this respect, it first provides a brief overview of the establishment of the European Networks of TSOs (ENTSOs), whose expertise serves as the basis for the elaboration of the network codes. Subsequently, it critically assesses the three-stage adoption procedure set in the Regulations. The analysis then shifts to a more normative dimension through the examination of the legal characterization of the basic acts involved in the adoption procedure, namely, the framework guidelines and network codes, and of the availability of judicial review.

Suggested Citation

  • Charikleia Vlachou, 2012. "The Adoption of Network Codes in the Field of Energy: Availability of Judicial Review in a Multi-Stage Procedure," RSCAS Working Papers 2012/39, European University Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2012/39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/23856/RSCAS_2012_39.pdf?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/23856
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brüning, Anna, 2014. "Towards a green internal electricity market: The self-regulation of European Transmission System Operators for Electricity within EU multilevel governance," IPE Working Papers 31/2014, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2012/39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RSCAS web unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.