IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsc/rsceui/2010-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Toward a Smart EU Energy Policy: Rationale and 22 Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Michel Glachant
  • Robert Grant
  • Manfred Hafner
  • Jacques de Jong

Abstract

We are in desperate need of an EU Energy Policy. The facts are that, yes, there is indeed an EU Energy Policy. It is a policy based on a vision, a vision with three components. The policy is aiming for “markets, competition and efficiency”, it is equally focussing on “a sustainable energy economy”, and thirdly, it wants to “secure the EU’s energy supply”. Three objectives, three separate action lines. Balancing the three objectives in an integrated approach is challenging and difficult. To what extent is the market approach consistent with the other two policy packages? What impact does a climate package with tradable emission rights and non-tradable targets for green energy have on the market designs for gas and electricity? Are the necessary investments in new pipes and wires for securing our energy supplies sufficiently coming under the prevailing regulatory framework? Or, to put it differently; are we smart enough in the way in which we are making implementing steps in order to meet our stated objectives? Our paper ends with a proposed new vision and a set of 22 recommendations to the new European Commission.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Michel Glachant & Robert Grant & Manfred Hafner & Jacques de Jong, 2010. "Toward a Smart EU Energy Policy: Rationale and 22 Recommendations," RSCAS Working Papers 2010/52, European University Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2010/52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cadmus.eui.eu/dspace/bitstream/1814/14181/1/RSCAS_2010_52.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    energy policy; climate change; security of energy supply; EU internal marke;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2010/52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RSCAS web unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.