IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsc/rsceui/2009-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to rationalize the debate about 'EU Energy Third Package'? Revisiting criteria to compare electricity transmission organizations

Author

Listed:
  • François Lévêque
  • Jean-Michel Glachant
  • Marcelo Saguan
  • Gildas de Muizon

Abstract

This article develops a theoretical framework to rank different electricity transmission organizations according five criteria (transaction cost saving, performance based regulation implementation, conflicts of interest, non-discriminatory access and benefits from regional integration). We demonstrate that ITSO is not always the first-best arrangement when taking into account the benefits from regional integration.

Suggested Citation

  • François Lévêque & Jean-Michel Glachant & Marcelo Saguan & Gildas de Muizon, 2009. "How to rationalize the debate about 'EU Energy Third Package'? Revisiting criteria to compare electricity transmission organizations," RSCAS Working Papers 2009/15, European University Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2009/15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/11028
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrien de Hauteclocque & Vincent Rious, 2009. "Reconsidering the Regulation of Merchant Transmission Investment in the Light of the Third Energy Package: The Role of Dominant Generators," RSCAS Working Papers 2009/59, European University Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    energy policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2009/15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RSCAS web unit). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.