IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/kietia/2023_003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Impact and Implications of US Outbound Investment Screening on China: A Korean Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Cho, Jaehan

    (Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade)

  • Cho, Eun Kyo

    (Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade)

  • Kyung, Heewon

    (Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade)

  • Choi, Mincheol

    (Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade)

  • Kim, Yong

    (Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade)

  • Kim, Hanhin

    (Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade)

Abstract

The Biden-Harris Administration issued an Executive Order in August to limit the financing of and investment in advanced technologies in China. Semiconductors, quantum computers, and artificial intelligence (AI) were specifically targeted. Beijing is expected to respond to the White House’s Executive Order by introducing its own financial restrictions targeting American companies, such as delays in the authorization of merger-and-acquisition (M&A) deals, while also taking measures to accelerate the fragmentation of the world economy into blocs by its augmenting technological competitiveness and related ecosystems. The direct recent order and its ramifications on South Korea are likely to be limited because financial linkages between China and Korea in many key technologies are weak. Nevertheless, Korean policymakers need to devise strategies that enhance the competitiveness of Korean certain technologies and attract investments from international investors, while navigating an increase in uncertainties over technology financing and investment stemming from White House action. The Korean strategy ought to (1) prepare for greater uncertainties in the financial markets of certain technologies and for a broadening of scope of certain technologies in the future, and potential calls to cooperate in US-led efforts to contain China, (2) prepare for an escalation of the US-China technology hegemony rivalry across all fronts, now that the US's China policy measures encompass the financial markets, (3) increase support for and technological cooperation with foreign investors, with a view toward attracting friend-shoring investments in Korean technologies, and (4) reinforce financial and investment strategies and loosen regulations to attract cutting-edge technologies through strategic M&A with foreign companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cho, Jaehan & Cho, Eun Kyo & Kyung, Heewon & Choi, Mincheol & Kim, Yong & Kim, Hanhin, 2023. "Assessing the Impact and Implications of US Outbound Investment Screening on China: A Korean Perspective," i-KIET Issues and Analysis 23/3, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:kietia:2023_003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4663197
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    US-China rivalry; protectionism; reshoring; friendshoring; economic security; economic nationalism; chips; semiconductors; batteries; electric vehicles; EVs; manufacturing; trade policy; trade protectionism; advanced technologies; Korea;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:kietia:2023_003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aaron Crossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kiettkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.