IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Possibilities for a Non-Quantitative-Dependent Economics:The Plurality of Methods facing the Dominance of Econometrics




Economics lives a moment where the dominant paradigm, based in neoclassical and rational choice ideas, seems very limited to comprehend the complexity of the reality. Economists and Economics are being severely criticized by their exaggerated use of mathematical formalization. It is important to stress that today, on the mainstream point of view, there is no other Economics (as a scientific field) unless the one which develops models with a strong emphasis on quantitative analysis to understand the economic mechanisms. Summing to this more theoretical debate a central practical question emerges: Economics is the science that is today being accused of supporting and legitimating free-market policies that have conducted to current global crisis, in particular with the deregulation of financial markets. Today econometrics, seen as dominant in terms of applicability, accuracy and efficiency, is widely used – other methods have been reduced to marginal contributions. But criticisms to econometrics are becoming extremely loud and consistent. Econometricians behave as if their techniques were universal when in fact they are not. If alternative methods are accepted, one can largely eliminate the restrictions and distance to the reality of econometrics. The current article debates the pathways for a Satisfactory Economics in a context where theoretical and methodological pluralism is entering even in mainstream ideas. It is presented the historical construction of econometrics as the main method in Economics and the limitations and possibilities of this tool are explored. Finally the need of pluralism is underlined. It is especially important when the techniques are very different and address different angles to a complex research problem. The working table of the applied economist should be prepared to benefit from all the complementarities of the various methods

Suggested Citation

  • Pinto, Hugo, 2009. "Possibilities for a Non-Quantitative-Dependent Economics:The Plurality of Methods facing the Dominance of Econometrics," Spatial and Organizational Dynamics Discussion Papers 2009-4, CIEO-Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:cieodp:2009_004

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Duque, José & Panagopoulos, Thomas, 2010. "Urban Planning throughout environmental quality and human well-being," Spatial and Organizational Dynamics Discussion Papers 2010-5, CIEO-Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Economics; Methodology; Pluralism; Econometrics; Orthodoxy;

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B23 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Econometrics; Quantitative and Mathematical Studies
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:cieodp:2009_004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Silvia Fernandes). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.