IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rif/dpaper/418.html

Decision and Negotiation Support for Transboundary Air Pollution Control between Finland, Russia and Estonia

Author

Listed:
  • Bushenkov, V.
  • Kaitala, V.
  • Lotov, V.
  • Pohjola, M

Abstract

We present instrumental software for negotiation and decision support for transboundary air pollution abatement. Using this system the decision-maker can interact with a multiple criteria optimization model consisting of regional sulphur abatement cost functions and of a submodel describing the transportation of sulphur between Finland, Russia and Estonia. The PC program visualizes the Pareto- optimal set of chosen policy criteria which may include sulphur deposition rates and abatement costs in some or all of the countries. The program also computes and displays the optimal abatement policy corresponding to the Pareto-optimal (or other attainable) point specified by the decision-maker.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Bushenkov, V. & Kaitala, V. & Lotov, V. & Pohjola, M, 1992. "Decision and Negotiation Support for Transboundary Air Pollution Control between Finland, Russia and Estonia," Discussion Papers 418, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    • Handle: RePEc:rif:dpaper:418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/dp418.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Roman V. Efremov & Alexander V. Lotov, 2014. "Multi-criteria Remote Asynchronous Group Decision Screening: An Experimental Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 31-48, January.
    3. Lotov, Alexander V., 1996. "Comment on D.J. White, "A characterization of the feasible set of objective function vectors in linear multiple objective problems" : European Journal of Operational Research 52 (1991) 361-3," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 215-220, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rif:dpaper:418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kaija Hyvönen-Rajecki (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etlaafi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.