IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/report/rp-25-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Will Increased Timber Harvesting on Federal Lands Reduce Growing Wildfire Hazards?

Author

Listed:
  • Wibbenmeyer, Matthew

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Wear, David N.

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

On March 1, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order (EO 14225) directing the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior to develop plans to increase timber production on federal lands. The order was motivated by two stated priorities: expanding the timber supply and addressing rising wildfire risks. The US Forest Service has responded with a goal of increasing timber offered for sale by 25 percent over the next four to five years. This report puts the Trump administration’s actions into context by reviewing the history of harvest from federal lands and evaluating current forest inventories and treatment needs. It asks: What would be the effect on wildfire risk if federal land management agencies increased harvests by 25 percent? Opportunities for harvests that successfully mitigate risk may be limited by the absence of active timber markets, the availability of a qualified workforce, and the economics of fuel removals. While selective harvesting can play a role in hazard reduction, effects on risk depend on how and where harvests are implemented. Market realities and declining federal capacity to implement nuanced, site-specific forest treatments present real constraints. Moreover, the national significance of expanded federal harvests is limited; federal lands have long accounted for a small share of total US timber production, and most timber now comes from private lands, particularly in the South. Whether agencies can achieve both increased timber supply and meaningful reductions in wildfire risk will depend on how strongly the latter goal is prioritized in the design of timber sales.

Suggested Citation

  • Wibbenmeyer, Matthew & Wear, David N., 2025. "Will Increased Timber Harvesting on Federal Lands Reduce Growing Wildfire Hazards?," RFF Reports 25-13, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-25-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4952/Report_25-13_BhevMRf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Camille Swezy & John Bailey & Woodam Chung, 2021. "Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra Nevada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Wear, David N. & Wibbenmeyer, Matthew & Joiner, Emily, 2024. "Enhancing the economic feasibility of fuel treatments: Market and policy pathways for US Federal Lands," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wear, David N., 2024. "Can Market Incentives for Wood Products Help Scale Wildfire Risk Reductions in the West?," RFF Reports 24-14, Resources for the Future.
    2. Wear, David N. & Wibbenmeyer, Matthew & Joiner, Emily, 2024. "Enhancing the economic feasibility of fuel treatments: Market and policy pathways for US Federal Lands," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-25-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.